“Conversation therapy” is a dangerous and discredited practice aimed at changing one’s sexual orientation or gender identity. I support the measure to ban “conversation therapy”. There is no scientific data to support the efficacy of such a practice. In fact, evidence to the contrary suggests that individuals suffering through “conversation therapy” may experience deleterious physical and psychological effects. Therapeutic interventions should be based on a demonstrated history of efficacy and adhere to one of the basic tenants of the health care profession, to “do no harm.” Even those who claim, “the ends justify the means” must recognize the inherent harm that is being perpetrated against the victims who are forced to undergo “conversation therapy interventions.” The “therapy” in and of its self is centered on the application of painful and uncomfortable stimuli, both physical and psychological, to an individual.   These practices are known to be extremely dangerous and can lead to depression, decreased self-esteem, substance abuse, and even suicide attempts.

I recognize that some oppose the ban in favor of protection of parents’ rights to educate their children without interference or regulation from the government. However, I question the degree to which “conversation therapy” is different from circumstances under which a health professional would be required to make a mandated report or in which an educational practitioner would intervene. For example, as a mandated reporter, if a child reports that they experienced physical conditions comparable to those employed in “conversation therapy”, such as electric shock to hands and/or genitals or nausea-inducing drugs concurrently with homoerotic stimuli, one would make a report to the state’s child protective services, as we know these actions are harmful to the child. Additionally, if an educational practitioner witnessed a child being subjected to psychological group pressures, asserting that the child is somehow mentally-ill or morally flawed, the practitioner would be required to intervene in order to thwart instances of bullying; as we know the effects from treatment like this can lead to harmful psychological effects. If we recognize these actions as harmful in one setting, what qualifies them as acceptable in another? No young person should ever be shamed by a mental health professional into thinking that who they are is wrong. Mental health professionals should provide care that is ethical and affirming for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender young people.