Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Medicine
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Licensure of Radiologic Technology [18 VAC 85 ‑ 101]
Action Licensure of radiologist assistants
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 2/4/2011
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
1/1/11  10:03 am
Commenter: Bill Bobrich R.T. (R)

Opposition to RA Legislation
 

Working in a hospital that has RPAs in its department, I find them to be a great asset to the department, not only do they serve as an extention to the radiologists, they are able to provide a more personalized experience to our patients, especially in  a time in health care when everything seems to be rushed and impersonal. I strongly oppose this legislation.

I oppose the draft regulations as written because it fails to acknowledge the contributions of the Radiology Practitioner Assistants to the radiology extender profession.

I am opposed to bill as it is currently written, because it currently excludes RPA.  RPA's are licensed by their own certification board (CBRPA) and should be granted recognition and privilages just as RA's.  The ARRT does not govern all imaging modalities.

I opposed this bill brecause it does not include the Radiology phyician assistants. They are a big asset to the Radiology committee and are supported by the ASRT,ARRT,ACR, and SRPE.

Respectively,

Bill Bobrich R.T. (R)

CommentID: 14865