Small Renewable Wind Energy Projects Permit by Rule
[9 VAC 15 ‑ 40]
On this Action:
CLOSED Opened on 6/21/2010 and Ended on 8/20/2010
15 comments
Comment Title | Commenter | |
---|---|---|
Comments | Amanda | 7/29/10 7:58 am |
Regulation | John | 7/29/10 7:59 am |
Wind energy | Jane | 7/29/10 8:03 am |
Small Renewable Wind Energy Projects | Himalayan Scenery | 8/1/10 8:10 am |
support | www.sixpackbible.com | 8/1/10 11:58 am |
Army Corps formal comments for wind PBR. | John Evans, Army Corps of Engineers, Water Resources Division | 8/18/10 2:00 pm |
Flawed Regulations Based on Flawed Legislation | Rick Webb, Virginia Wind (VaWind.org) | 8/20/10 10:38 am |
Circumventing of established regulations | Richard M. Laska, Laska's Grove | 8/20/10 11:42 am |
Incompatibility with existing agreements/interests | Richard M. Laska, Laska's Grove | 8/20/10 12:03 pm |
Comments on the Small Renewable Wind Energy Projects "Permit by Rule" | Pamela C. Dodds, Ph.D., Registered Professional Geologist | 8/20/10 2:22 pm |
Need for Memoranda of Understanding Between Participating Review Agencies | Rick Thomas, Timmons Group | 8/20/10 3:09 pm |
No Support for Proposed Rule Making to Permit 'small renewable energy project greater than 5 MW | Allegheny Front Alliance | 8/20/10 5:20 pm |
Cumulative impacts ignored by proposed permit by rule | Richard M. Laska, Laska's Grove | 8/20/10 8:32 pm |
DEQ Wind PBR | JD | 8/20/10 10:02 pm |
PBR needs more work | Virginia | 8/20/10 10:27 pm |
3 comments hidden due to violation of Town Hall policy
Trouble posting comments? These pages have been tested with multiple versions of all the major browsers.
If you have trouble: (1) try another computer if you have access to one, (2) try another browser if your computer has one installed (3) contact
Town Hall support staff for assistance.