Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Department of General Services
Department of General Services
Regulations Banning Concealed Firearms in Offices Occupied by Executive Branch Agencies [1 VAC 30 ‑ 105]
Action Promulgation of new regulation banning concealed firearms in executive branch agency offices
Stage Emergency/NOIRA
Comment Period Ends 1/27/2016
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
12/15/15  8:26 pm
Commenter: Frederick Dombroski

This regulation is dangerous to public safety

This proposed regulation will have the opposite of the intended affect by playing into the hands of terrorists, violent criminals, and the criminally insane. All but two of the public massacres since 1950 had been committed by criminals and terrorists in “gun-free zones,” which is exactly what this regulation creates.

We have had no shootings in state agencies and this prohibition on those with a concealed handgun permit, and Off-duty police officers, some of whom have active and ongoing threats to their lives, is entirely without any justification and needlessly and recklessly endangers innocent lives.


Disarming good citizens (who are the only ones likely to obey the prohibition) does not make them safer and the cost of providing additional security to protect everyone who has been disarmed by this regulation will be prohibitive


Importantly the Governor has no authority for this regulation. The ban won’t hold up in court, due to lack of authority by the Governor. If the General Assembly wanted the Governor to have such power, they would have granted it to him explicitly, as is required constitutionally.


This proposed regulation is a solution for which there is no problem.  It endangers state employees, law abiding citizens, and the innocent by making state buildings a safe zone for terrorists, criminals, and the criminally insane to conduct their evil and savage actions.


This regulations should not be approved and the emergency regulation withdrawn.


Please extended the comment period for another 30 days.


CommentID: 44608