Lest opponents argue that there are increased costs in implementing clean energy programs, the trading of carbon pollution with demonstrate that pollution costs, too, without the benefits of clean energy. Moreover, it is better to pay those costs now in terms of limiting pollution and helpng to mitigate climate change than to pay the increased costs from disasters, including flooding from sea level rise, caused by climate change. Virginia has areas, such as Norfolk, Hampton Roads, and the areas along the Chesapeake Bay and tidewater regions of our rivers that are in the path of the negative effects of climate change. We need the strongest possible plan to move toward a clean energy future, both to mitigate disasters and to protect against the harmful effects and envrironmental degradtion caused by pollution. 

I am glad to see Virginia taking steps to cut carbon pollution to combat climate change, despite Trump’s continued attacks on environmental protections. As a Virginian, I am eager to see the state produce a strong, equitable, and scientifically sound plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

I request that DEQ use its authority to:
• Create a rule based on the strongest available science that significantly reduces carbon pollution from Virginia’s power plants.
• Ensure that Virginia residents benefit from any profits from carbon standards, especially front-line communities.
• Address the disproportionate environmental burdens experienced by vulnerable communities.
• Grow the clean energy economy by maximizing investments in zero-carbon wind, solar, and energy efficiency.
• Provide accessible public hearing opportunities in the evenings in multiple parts of the state to ensure all concerned Virginians can fully participate in the rule-making process.

(Re: 9VAC5-140, Regulation for Emissions Trading Programs)
(NOIRA Stage: Reduce and Cap Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel Fired Electric Power Generating Facilities (Rev. C17))