Department of Planning and BudgetAn official website of the Commonwealth of Virginia Here's how you knowAn official websiteHere's how you know

Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Environmental Quality
 
Board
State Water Control Board
 
chapter
Certification of Nonpoint Source Nutrient Credits (formerly 4VAC50-80) [9 VAC 25 ‑ 900]
Action Promulgate new Nutrient Trading Certification Regulations
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 3/16/2015
spacer
Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
3/11/15  2:28 pm
Commenter: John Blair Reeves; engineer & Va. citizen

Proposed: Nutrient Trading Certification Regs.- Deadline for Comments =Mar. 16, 2015
 

To:  Ms. Debra Harris; Va. DEQ; Richmond, Va.             March 11, 2015

Re: My Comments: DEQ's Proposed- Nutrient Trading Certification Regulations

Dear Ms. Harris & Va. DEQ,

Yes, the Va. DEQ staff has worked long and hard to gain many strong points in subject, needed Regs.

Yes, some improvements appear needed; here's my offering:

1. Strengthen provisions to protect local water quality.

  a) Double check-- does whole program comply with EPA's guidance regarding timing and location of trades?;

  b) Double check-- do overall Regs. prohibit trades that will degrade { what adverb here?; measurably ?? } local waterways?

2. Ensure *real water quality improvements.

  a) DEQ must specify that baseline conditions on farms/ ranches will include vegetated, robust-designed buffers 35' in width on pastureland, or maybe, in special contour cases along a stream, specify best-practical buffer widths up to 33% of the length of the riparian buffer (per advise of local, trained Soil & Water Conservation Board staff, Va. Extension Service staff, &/or properly certified consultant).

  b) Require practical water testing to demonstrate tangible improvements to both local and downstream waters.

3. Sustain transparency.  

  a) Provide for meaningful public access (ex.- DEQ's website show current, essential information about the practices that will generate *trade-able credits).

  b) Provide a 30-day period for the Public to offer comments &/or alternative actions.

  c) Double-check: For about zero-cost, get some volunteers at each DEQ Regional Office to ask ~25+ citizens/each Region- any problems in seeing these Regs., the nutrient trading and understanding the benefits of these type of pollution trades?  Even some simple focus-groups might be useful.

     Its important to show overall awareness (ex.- big-picture ideas- like the Fed. ADA initiatives)- lots of citizens are not up to 65 MPH, or even 55 MPH-- on the WWW.web (and DEQ's complex web-site), especially those of us over 65! 

Thank you for considering my comments.  Also, thanks for your good service to our vital Commonwealth.

John B. Reeves  P.E.                

    400 Silver Oaks Drive;   Rockingham, Va.  22801-3579

    (540) 433- 9358   JBR1948@Comcast.net

 

CommentID: 39481