Agency
Department of Medical Assistance Services
 
Board
Board of Medical Assistance Services
 
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
10/11/26  5:27 am
Commenter: MARY LLOYD

Subject: Strongly Oppose the Elimination of Services Facilitation and other changes
 
Consumer-Directed Services
I am a parent and Employer of Record in Northern Virginia, writing to strongly oppose the proposed elimination of independent Services Facilitation and the transition to a centralized Support Broker model.
My son is severely disabled and medically requires 24-hour total care to remain safe in our home. Despite his profound medical needs, the system recently cut his hours down to just 52.5 hours per week. I am currently working with two of his medical specialists who are writing formal letters certifying that his condition requires round-the-clock care.
This proposed transition does not benefit consumers; it strips away humanity and builds a system designed to cut costs at the expense of vulnerable individuals.
My specific objections to these changes are:
  • Severe Conflict of Interest: Independent Services Facilitators are critical allies for families. They understand our children's medical histories and advocate for us to secure necessary care. Absorbing facilitators into the Fiscal Employer Agents (PPL/CDCN) creates a massive conflict of interest. A Support Broker paid by the entities managing the state's Medicaid funds will face inherent pressure to restrict or deny authorizations rather than advocate for the consumer's maximum needs.
  • Compounding an Already Broken System: DMAS is already cutting hours for individuals who desperately need them, as evidenced by my son's recent reduction. Forcing families to navigate a monolithic, centralized broker system without independent guidance will make appealing unfair hour reductions nearly impossible for exhausted caregiving families.
  • The Invisible Burden of "Soft Caps": While DMAS claims hours above 56 are accessible via exceptions, the administrative burden of constantly re-proving profound disability creates a barrier that naturally results in vulnerable individuals losing the care they require to survive safely in the community.
DMAS must preserve independent, third-party Services Facilitation to ensure families have conflict-free advocacy. I urge DMAS and CMS to reject these amendments, prioritize the humanity of the individuals these waivers are meant to serve, and stop implementing measures that restrict vital care hours.
CommentID: 242304