Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Environmental Quality
 
Board
State Water Control Board
 
chapter
Water Quality Management Planning Regulation [9 VAC 25 ‑ 720]
Action Amend Nutrient Waste Load Allocations in Section 50.C. for the Merck WWTP and the Frederick-Winchester Service Authority Opequon WRF
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 7/25/2008
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
7/24/08  10:09 pm
Commenter: Alan Raflo

Proposed Action to Increase Nutrient Discharge Caps by Merck and Winchester-Frederick PSA
 

I am writing to oppose the proposed increase of the nutrient-discharge caps for the Merck Pharmaceutical and the Frederick-Winchester Service Authority wastewater treatment facilities, unless the company and the authority are required to fund nutrient offsets within the Shenandoah-Potomac watershed that result in no net increase of discharged nutrients in the watershed.  This seems like a perfect opportunity to put the state's new nutrient credit exchange program into practice.

Alan Raflo

Blacksburg, Virginia

CommentID: 1936