The proposed regulation has failed to address Delta 8. As written Delta 9 and Delta 10 are  addressed in such a manor that one can conclude theses two products as unique substances. How ever the absence of Delta 8 gives a wondering if the regulation is an effort to redefine Delta 8, a legal substance at the Federal level. Delta 8's properties are unique in such away that the Federal level has classified this substance as legal. As a result many small businesses use Delta 8 as a core source of there business revenues. This regulation as written makes inferences that could make Delta 8 illegal and eventually destroy small businesses. Go back to the table and leave Delta 8 alone.