Proposed Text
A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).
TMDL # |
Stream Name |
TMDL Title |
City/County |
WBID |
Pollutant |
WLA1 |
Units |
1. |
Muddy Creek, Dry River, and tributaries to North River |
Nitrate TMDL Development for Muddy Creek/Dry River, Virginia |
Rockingham |
B21R, B22R |
Nitrate |
49,389.00 |
LB/YR |
2. |
Blacks Run |
Revision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County |
Rockingham, City of Harrisonburg |
B26R |
Sediment |
1,310,000 |
LB/YR |
3. |
Cooks Creek |
Revision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County |
Rockingham |
B25R |
Sediment |
1,543,000 |
LB/YR |
4. |
Cooks Creek |
Revision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County |
Rockingham |
B25R |
Phosphorus |
2,060 |
LB/YR |
5. |
Muddy Creek |
TMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia |
Rockingham |
B22R |
Sediment |
286,939.00 |
LB/YR |
6. |
Muddy Creek |
TMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia |
Rockingham |
B22R |
Phosphorus |
38.00 |
LB/YR |
7. |
Holmans Creek |
TMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia |
Rockingham, Shenandoah |
B45R |
Sediment |
78,141.00 |
LB/YR |
8. |
Mill Creek |
TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run |
Rockingham |
B29R |
Sediment |
276.00 |
LB/YR |
9. |
Mill Creek |
TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run |
Rockingham |
B29R |
Phosphorus |
116.00 |
LB/YR |
10. |
Pleasant Run |
TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run |
Rockingham |
B27R |
Sediment |
0.00 |
LB/YR |
11. |
Pleasant Run |
TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run |
Rockingham |
B27R |
Phosphorus |
0.00 |
LB/YR |
12. |
Linville Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Linville Creek: Bacteria and Benthic Impairments |
Rockingham |
B46R |
Sediment |
5.50 |
TONS/YR |
13. |
Quail Run |
Benthic TMDL for Quail Run |
Rockingham |
B35R |
Ammonia |
7,185.00 |
KG/YR |
14. |
Quail Run |
Benthic TMDL for Quail Run |
Rockingham |
B35R |
Chlorine |
27.63 |
KG/YR |
15. |
Shenandoah River |
Development of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (South Fork and Main Stem) |
Warren, Clarke |
B41R B55R B57R B58R |
PCBs |
179.38 |
G/YR |
16. |
Shenandoah River |
Development of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (North Fork) |
Warren, Clarke |
B51R |
PCBs |
0.00 |
G/YR |
17. |
Shenandoah River |
Development of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (Main Stem) |
Warren, Clarke |
WV |
PCBs |
179.38 |
G/YR |
18. |
Cockran Spring |
Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins |
Augusta |
B10R |
Organic solids |
1,556.00 |
LB/YR |
19. |
Lacey Spring |
Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins |
Rockingham |
B47R |
Organic solids |
680.00 |
LB/YR |
20. |
Orndorff Spring |
Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins |
Shenandoah |
B52R |
Organic solids |
103.00 |
LB/YR |
21. |
Toms Brook |
Benthic TMDL for Toms Brook in Shenandoah County, Virginia |
Shenandoah |
B50R |
Sediment |
8.1 |
T/YR |
22. |
Goose Creek |
Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun, Fauquier |
A08R |
Sediment |
1,587 |
T/YR |
23. |
Little River |
Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun |
A08R |
Sediment |
105 |
T/YR |
24. |
Christians Creek |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA |
Augusta |
B14R |
Sediment |
145 |
T/YR |
25. |
Moffett Creek |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA |
Augusta |
B13R |
Sediment |
0 |
T/YR |
26. |
Upper Middle River |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA |
Augusta |
B10R |
Sediment |
1.355 |
T/YR |
27. |
Mossy Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments |
Rockingham |
B19R |
Sediment |
0.04 |
T/YR |
28. |
Smith Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Smith Creek |
Rockingham, Shenandoah |
B47R |
Sediment |
353,867 |
LB/YR |
29. |
Abrams Creek |
Opequon Watershed TMDLs for Benthic Impairments: Abrams Creek and Lower Opequon Creek, Frederick and Clarke counties, Virginia |
Frederick |
B09R |
Sediment |
478 |
T/YR |
30. |
Lower Opequon Creek |
Opequon Watershed TMDLs for Benthic Impairments: Abrams Creek and Lower Opequon Creek, Frederick and Clarke counties, Virginia |
Frederick, Clarke |
B09R |
Sediment |
1,039 |
T/YR |
31. |
Mill Creek |
Mill Creek Sediment TMDL for a Benthic Impairment, Shenandoah County, Virginia |
Shenandoah |
B48R |
Sediment |
0.9 |
T/YR |
32. |
South Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for South Run, Virginia |
Fauquier |
A19R |
Phosphorus |
0.038 |
T/YR |
33. |
Lewis Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic) |
Augusta |
B12R |
Sediment |
40 |
T/YR |
34. |
Lewis Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic) |
Augusta |
B12R |
Lead |
0 |
KG/YR |
35. |
Lewis Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic) |
Augusta |
B12R |
PAHs |
0 |
KG/YR |
36. |
Bull Run |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic) |
Loudoun, Fairfax, and Prince William Counties, and the Cities of Manassas and Manassas Park |
A23R-01 |
Sediment |
5,986.8 |
T/TR |
37. |
Popes Head Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic) |
Fairfax County and Fairfax City |
A23R-02 |
Sediment |
1,594.2 |
T/YR |
38. |
Accotink Bay |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A15R |
PCBs |
0.0992 |
G/YR |
39. |
Aquia Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Stafford |
A28E |
PCBs |
6.34 |
G/YR |
40. |
Belmont Bay/ |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Prince William |
A25E |
PCBs |
0.409 |
G/YR |
41. |
Chopawamsic Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Prince William |
A26E |
PCBs |
1.35 |
G/YR |
42. |
Coan River |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Northumberland |
A34E |
PCBs |
0 |
G/YR |
43. |
Dogue Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A14E |
PCBs |
20.2 |
G/YR |
44. |
Fourmile Run |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Arlington |
A12E |
PCBs |
11 |
G/YR |
45. |
Gunston Cove |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A15E |
PCBs |
0.517 |
G/YR |
46. |
Hooff Run & Hunting Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A13E |
PCBs |
36.8 |
G/YR |
47. |
Little Hunting Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A14E |
PCBs |
10.1 |
G/YR |
48. |
Monroe Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A31E |
PCBs |
.0177 |
G/YR |
49. |
Neabsco Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Prince William |
A25E |
PCBs |
6.63 |
G/YR |
50. |
Occoquan River |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Prince William |
A25E |
PCBs |
2.86 |
G/YR |
51. |
Pohick Creek/Pohick Bay |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Fairfax |
A16E |
PCBs |
13.5 |
G/YR |
52. |
Potomac Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Stafford |
A29E |
PCBs |
0.556 |
G/YR |
53. |
Potomac River, Fairview Beach |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
King George |
A29E |
PCBs |
0.0183 |
G/YR |
54. |
Powells Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Prince William |
A26R |
PCBs |
0.0675 |
G/YR |
55. |
Quantico Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
Prince William |
A26R |
PCBs |
0.742 |
G/YR |
56. |
Upper Machodoc Creek |
PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries |
King George |
A30E |
PCBs |
0.0883 |
G/YR |
57. |
Difficult Creek |
Benthic TMDL Development for Difficult Run, Virginia |
Fairfax |
A11R |
Sediment |
3,663.2 |
T/YR |
58. |
(Reserved) |
||||||
59. |
(Reserved) |
||||||
60. |
South River |
Bacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River |
Augusta and Rockingham |
B32R |
Sediment |
619.4 |
T/YR |
61. |
South River |
Bacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River |
Augusta and Rockingham |
B32R |
Phosphorus |
6,929.9 |
KG/YR |
62. |
South River |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia |
Augusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren |
B32R |
Mercury |
112 |
G/YR |
63. |
South Fork Shenandoah River |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia |
Augusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren |
B32R, B33R |
Mercury |
112 |
G/YR |
64. |
Shenandoah River |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia |
Augusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren |
B32R, B33R |
Mercury |
112 |
G/YR |
65. |
Spout Run |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed, Clarke County, Virginia |
Clarke |
B57R |
Sediment |
7.44 |
T/YR |
66. |
West Strait Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek |
Highland |
B02R |
Sediment |
0.02 |
T/D |
67. |
West Strait Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek |
Highland |
B02R |
CBOD5 |
11 |
KG/D |
68. |
West Strait Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek |
Highland |
B02R |
Dry season (June – December) ammonia as N |
1.6 |
KG/D |
69. |
West Strait Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek |
Highland |
B02R |
Wet season (January – May) ammonia as N |
2.9 |
KG/D |
70. |
Strait Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek |
Highland |
B02R |
Sediment |
0.08 |
T/D |
71. |
Accotink Creek, lower |
Bacteria TMDL for the Lower Accotink Creek Watershed |
Fairfax |
A15 |
E. coli |
1.76E 12 |
cfu/year |
72. |
Accotink Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL for Accotink Creek |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Fecal coliform |
1.30E 14 |
cfu/year |
73. |
Beaver Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Beaver Creek |
Rockingham |
B18 |
E. coli |
1.22E 10 |
cfu/year |
74. |
Blacks Run |
Fecal Coliform TMDL for Blacks Run |
Harrisonburg |
B26 |
Fecal coliform |
5.52E 09 |
cfu/year |
75. |
North Fork Catoctin Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments |
Loudoun |
A02 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
76. |
Lower South Fork Catoctin Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments |
Loudoun |
A02 |
Fecal coliform |
1.60E 11 |
cfu/year |
77. |
Upper South Fork Catoctin Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments |
Loudoun |
A02 |
Fecal coliform |
4.42E 11 |
cfu/year |
78. |
Catoctin Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments |
Loudoun |
A02 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
79. |
Licking Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Cedar Run and Licking Run |
Fauquier |
A17 |
E. coli |
2.61E 09 |
cfu/year |
80. |
Cedar Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Cedar Run and Licking Run |
Prince William, Fauquier |
A17, A18 |
E. coli |
5.58E 11 |
cfu/year |
81. |
Christians Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL for Christians Creek |
Augusta |
B14 |
Fecal coliform |
1.18E 13 |
cfu/year |
82. |
Coan River (145G) |
Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
83. |
Coan River, Headly Cove (145H) |
Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
84. |
Coan River, Killneck Creek (145E) |
Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
85. |
Coan River, Stevens Point (145F) |
Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
86. |
Mill Creek and the Coan River (145I) |
Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
87. |
The Glebe (145D) |
Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
88. |
Bridgeman Creek |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
7.70E 08 |
MPN/day |
89. |
Cod Creek, east |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
9.06E 08 |
MPN/day |
90. |
Rogers Creek |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
9.83E 08 |
MPN/day |
91. |
Cod Creek, west |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
1.53E 09 |
MPN/day |
92. |
Presley Creek |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
3.63E 09 |
MPN/day |
93. |
Hack Creek |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
3.00E 09 |
MPN/day |
94. |
Cubitt Creek |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
4.25E 09 |
MPN/day |
95. |
Hull Creek |
Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Northumberland |
A34 |
Fecal coliform |
1.27E 10 |
MPN/day |
96. |
Cooks Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Cooks Creek |
Rockingham, Harrisonburg |
B25, B26 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
97. |
Cub Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for Cub Run |
Rockingham |
B34 |
E. coli |
1.74E 10 |
cfu/year |
98. |
Difficult Run |
Bacteria TMDL for the Difficult Run Watershed |
Fairfax |
A11 |
E. coli |
9.86E 12 |
cfu/year |
99. |
Dry River |
Fecal Coliform TMDL for Dry River |
Rockingham |
B20, B21, B22 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
100. |
Four Mile Run |
Fecal Coliform TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Development for Four Mile Run |
Arlington, Alexandria |
A12 |
Fecal coliform |
2.04E 13 |
cfu/year |
101. |
Jackson Creek |
Gardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
1.44E 09 |
MPN/day |
102. |
Gardner Creek |
Gardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
1.96E 09 |
MPN/day |
103. |
Bonum Creek |
Gardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
2.96E 09 |
MPN/day |
104. |
Little River |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Fauquier |
A08 |
Fecal coliform |
1.38E 10 |
cfu/year |
105. |
South Fork Sycolin Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun |
A08 |
Fecal coliform |
1.41E 10 |
cfu/year |
106. |
Sycolin Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun |
A08 |
Fecal coliform |
2.79E 10 |
cfu/year |
107. |
Cromwells Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Fauquier |
A05 |
Fecal coliform |
9.80E 10 |
cfu/year |
108. |
Beaverdam Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun |
A07 |
Fecal coliform |
1.21E 12 |
cfu/year |
109. |
North Fork Goose Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun |
A06 |
Fecal coliform |
3.11E 13 |
cfu/year |
110. |
Goose Creek and tributaries |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed |
Loudoun, Fauquier |
A04, A05, A06, A07, A08 |
Fecal coliform |
3.88E 13 |
cfu/year |
111. |
Hawksbill Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hawksbill Creek |
Page |
B39 |
E. coli |
3.13E 12 |
cfu/year |
112. |
Hogue Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bacteria (E. coli) Impairment in Hogue Creek |
Frederick |
B06 |
E. coli |
6.58E 11 |
cfu/year |
113. |
Holmans Creek |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Holmans Creek |
Shenandoah |
B45 |
Fecal coliform |
3.20E 10 |
cfu/year |
114. |
Holmes Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds |
Fairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church |
A13 |
E. coli |
8.38E 13 |
cfu/year |
115. |
Cameron Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds |
Fairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church |
A13 |
E. coli |
1.33E 14 |
cfu/year |
116. |
Hunting Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds |
Fairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church |
A13 |
E. coli |
3.24E 14 |
cfu/year |
117. |
Limestone Branch |
Bacteria TMDL for Limestone Branch |
Loudoun |
A03 |
E. coli |
5.83E 11 |
cfu/year |
118. |
Linville Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Linville Creek: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments |
Rockingham |
B46 |
E. coli |
1.10E 11 |
cfu/year |
119. |
Bridge Creek (10-9X) |
Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
120. |
Little Wicomico River (10-19) |
Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
121. |
Little Wicomico River (10-20) |
Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
122. |
Little Wicomico River, Cod Creek (10-13.5Z) |
Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Northumberland |
A34 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
123. |
Branson Cove |
Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
4.11E 08 |
MPN/day |
124. |
Cabin Point Creek |
Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
1.93E 09 |
MPN/day |
125. |
Glebe and Ames Creeks |
Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
2.13E 09 |
MPN/day |
126. |
Lower Machodoc Creek |
Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
9.67E 09 |
MPN/day |
127. |
Weatherall Creek |
Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
9.95E 08 |
MPN/day |
128. |
Mattox Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek |
Westmoreland, King George |
A31 |
E. coli |
2.20E 06 |
cfu/year |
129. |
Mattox Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek |
Westmoreland, King George |
A31 |
Enterococci |
1.26E 10 |
cfu/year |
130. |
Mattox Creek tidal (shellfish) |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek |
Westmoreland, King George |
A31 |
Fecal coliform |
5.03E 09 |
cfu/year |
131. |
Moffett Creek |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds |
Augusta |
B13 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
132. |
Polecat Draft |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds |
Augusta |
B15 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
133. |
Lewis Creek |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds |
Staunton |
B12 |
E. coli |
3.48E 09 |
cfu/year |
134. |
Upper Middle River |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds |
Augusta |
B10, B11 |
E. coli |
8.53E 09 |
cfu/year |
135. |
Upper South River |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds |
Augusta |
B30 |
E. coli |
1.06E 11 |
cfu/year |
136. |
Lower Middle River watershed |
Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds |
Augusta, Staunton |
B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15 |
E. coli |
1.24E 13 |
cfu/year |
137. |
Mill Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development Mill Creek Bacteria (E. coli) Impairment |
Page |
B38 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
138. |
Mill Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run |
Rockingham |
B29 |
Total phosphorus |
116 |
lbs/year |
139. |
Mill Creek and tributaries |
Fecal coliform TMDL for Mill Creek Watershed |
Rockingham |
B29 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
140. |
Mill Creek including unnamed tributary to Kissinger Millpond and Kissinger Millpond |
Bacteria TMDL for (nontidal) Mill Creek including Un-named Tributary to Kissinger Millpond, and Kissinger Millpond |
Northumberland |
A33 |
E. coli |
5.91E 10 |
cfu/year |
141. |
Monroe Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Monroe Bay: Monroe Creek |
Westmoreland |
A31 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
142. |
Mossy Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments |
Augusta |
B19 |
E. coli |
1.74E 09 |
cfu/year |
143. |
Long Glade Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments |
Augusta |
B24 |
E. coli |
5.23E 09 |
cfu/year |
144. |
Muddy Creek |
Fecal coliform TMDL for Muddy Creek |
Rockingham |
B22 |
Fecal coliform |
3.04E 11 |
cfu/year |
145. |
Naked Creek |
Fecal coliform TMDL for Naked Creek |
Augusta |
B28 |
Fecal coliform |
5.54E 09 |
cfu/year |
146. |
Neabsco Creek |
Bacteria TMDL for Neabsco Creek |
Prince William |
A25 |
E. coli |
1.27E 12 |
cfu/day |
147. |
Barnes Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
148. |
Buckner Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
149. |
Cold Harbor Bay |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
150. |
Currioman Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
151. |
Nomini Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
152. |
North Prong Buckner Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
153. |
Pierce Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek |
Westmoreland |
A32 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
154. |
Mill Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River |
Shenandoah |
B48 |
E. coli |
8.80E 09 |
cfu/year |
155. |
Stony Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River |
Shenandoah |
B49 |
E. coli |
4.42E 12 |
cfu/year |
156. |
North Fork Shenandoah River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River |
Frederick, Rockingham, Shenandoah |
B42, B43, B44, B45, B46, B47, B48, B49, B50, B51, B52, B53, B54 |
E. coli |
1.02E 13 |
cfu/year |
157. |
North River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North River |
Augusta, Staunton, Rockingham, Harrisonburg |
B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23, B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29 |
E. coli |
5.32E 13 |
cfu/year |
158. |
Broad Run (3) (VAN-A19R-05) |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Prince William, Fauquier |
A19 |
E. coli |
2.35E 10 |
cfu/year |
159. |
Little Bull Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Prince William |
A21 |
E. coli |
3.29E 10 |
cfu/year |
160. |
Broad Run (2) (VAN-A19R-02) |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Fauquier |
A19 |
E. coli |
1.36E 11 |
cfu/year |
161. |
Occoquan River |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Manassas, Fauquier, Prince William |
A17, A18, A19, A20 |
E. coli |
2.29E 11 |
cfu/year |
162. |
South Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Fauquier |
A19 |
E. coli |
4.32E 11 |
cfu/year |
163. |
Broad Run (1) (VAN-A19R-01) |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Fauquier |
A19 |
E. coli |
5.84E 11 |
cfu/year |
164. |
Popes Head Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Fairfax |
A23 |
E. coli |
7.12E 11 |
cfu/year |
165. |
Kettle Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Prince William |
A19 |
E. coli |
8.30E 12 |
cfu/year |
166. |
Bull Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River |
Manassas Park, Prince William, Fairfax, Loudoun |
A21, A22, A23 |
E. coli |
1.11E 14 |
cfu/year |
167. |
Abrams Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek |
Frederick, Winchester |
B09 |
E. coli |
3.10E 12 |
cfu/year |
168. |
Upper Opequon Creek watershed |
Bacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek |
Frederick |
B08 |
E. coli |
1.13E 13 |
cfu/year |
169. |
Lower Opequon Creek watershed and tributaries |
Bacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek |
Frederick, Clarke, Winchester |
B08, B09 |
E. coli |
2.13E 13 |
cfu/year |
170. |
Piney Run |
Bacteria TMDL for Piney Run |
Loudoun |
A01 |
E. coli |
3.48E 09 |
cfu/year |
171. |
Pleasant Run |
Fecal coliform TMDL for Pleasant Run |
Rockingham |
B27 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
172. |
Popes Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Mattox Creek to Currioman Bay |
Westmoreland |
A31 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
173. |
Potomac Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Stafford |
A29 |
E. coli |
1.77E 11 |
cfu/year |
174. |
Potomac River, unnamed tributary |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Stafford |
A26 |
E. coli |
3.92E 11 |
cfu/year |
175. |
Chopawamsic Creek, North Branch |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Prince William |
A26 |
E. coli |
4.01E 11 |
cfu/year |
176. |
Potomac Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Stafford |
A29 |
E. coli |
7.35E 11 |
cfu/year |
177. |
Quantico Creek, South Fork |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Prince William |
A26 |
E. coli |
1.09E 12 |
cfu/year |
178. |
Accokeek Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Stafford |
A29 |
E. coli |
3.18E 12 |
cfu/year |
179. |
Powells Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Prince William |
A26 |
E. coli |
3.18E 12 |
cfu/year |
180. |
Quantico Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Prince William |
A26 |
E. coli |
3.75E 12 |
cfu/year |
181. |
Austin Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties |
Stafford |
A28 |
E. coli |
3.14E 13 |
cfu/year |
182. |
Rosier Creek |
Bacteria TMDL for Rosier Creek Watershed |
King George |
A31 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
183. |
Smith Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Smith Creek |
Shenandoah, Rockingham |
B47 |
E. coli |
8.53E 11 |
cfu/year |
184. |
South Fork Shenandoah River |
Bacteria TMDL Development and Benthic Stressor Analysis for South Fork Shenandoah River |
Augusta, Staunton, Rockingham, Harrisonburg, Page, Warren, Waynesboro |
B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23, B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29, B30, B31, B32, B33, B34, B35, B36, B37, B38, B39, B40, B41 |
E. coli |
1.43E 14 |
cfu/year |
185. |
South River |
Bacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River |
Augusta, Waynesboro |
B30, B31, B32 |
E. coli |
1.13E 14 |
cfu/year |
186. |
Page Brook |
Total Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed |
Clarke |
B57 |
E. coli |
2.18E 11 |
cfu/year |
187. |
Roseville Run |
Total Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed |
Clarke |
B57 |
E. coli |
3.05E 11 |
cfu/year |
188. |
Spout Run |
Total Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed |
Clarke |
B57 |
E. coli |
5.22E 11 |
cfu/year |
189. |
Mine Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run |
Fairfax |
A11 |
E. coli |
1.22E 11 |
cfu/year |
190. |
Pimmit Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run |
Arlington, Fairfax |
A12 |
E. coli |
1.17E 12 |
cfu/year |
191. |
Sugarland Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run |
Fairfax |
A10 |
E. coli |
4.78E 12 |
cfu/year |
192. |
Tidal Four Mile Run |
Bacteria TMDL for the Tidal Four Mile Run |
Arlington, Alexandria |
A12 |
E. coli |
1.42E 14 |
cfu/year |
193. |
Deep Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek |
King George |
A30 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
194. |
Upper Machodoc Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek |
King George |
A30 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
195. |
Williams Creek, Upper Machodoc Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek |
King George |
A30 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
196. |
Dungan Cove |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River |
Northumberland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
197. |
Hampton Hall Branch |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River |
Westmoreland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
198. |
Lodge Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River |
Northumberland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
199. |
Mill Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River |
Northumberland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
200. |
White Point Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River |
Westmoreland |
A33 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
201. |
Crooked Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Frederick, Warren |
B56R |
E. coli |
2.22E 12 |
cfu/year |
202. |
Borden Marsh Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Clarke, Warren |
B55R |
E.coli |
2.81E 11 |
cfu/year |
203. |
Willow Brook |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Warren |
B55R |
E. coli |
2.33E 11 |
cfu/year |
204. |
West Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Frederick, Warren |
B56R |
E. coli |
5.80E 11 |
cfu/year |
205. |
Long Branch |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Clarke |
B57R |
E. coli |
1.73E 11 |
cfu/year |
206. |
Stephens Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Frederick |
B56R |
E. coli |
3.07E 11 |
cfu/year |
207. |
Manassas Run |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Warren |
B55R |
E. coli |
3.24E 11 |
cfu/year |
208. |
Happy Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Warren |
B41R |
E. coli |
4.27E 11 |
cfu/year |
209. |
Happy Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed |
Warren |
B41R |
Sediment |
29.05 |
tons/year |
210. |
Turley Creek |
TMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen) |
Rockingham |
B45 |
Sediment |
19.87 |
tons/year |
211. |
Long Meadow Run |
TMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen) |
Rockingham |
B45 |
Sediment |
27.92 |
tons/year |
212. |
Long Meadow Run |
TMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen) |
Rockingham |
B45 |
Nitrogen |
520.6 |
lbs/year |
213. |
Upper Accotink Creek |
Sediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Sediment |
2,338 |
tons/year |
214. |
Lower Accotink Creek |
Sediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Sediment |
3,073 |
tons/year |
215. |
Long Branch (central) |
Sediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Sediment |
936 |
tons/year |
216. |
Upper Accotink Creek |
Chloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Chloride |
5,444,279 |
lbs/year |
217. |
Lower Accotink Creek |
Chloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Chloride |
3,723,479 |
lbs/year |
218. |
Long Branch (central) |
Chloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia |
Fairfax, Fairfax City |
A15 |
Chloride |
873,049 |
lbs/year |
219. |
North Fork Catoctin Creek |
A TMDL and Watershed Management Plan to Address Sediment in North Fork Catoctin Creek Located in Loudoun County, Virginia |
Loudoun |
A02R |
Sediment |
99.1 |
tons/year |
Notes: 2There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area. |
B. Non-TMDL wasteload allocations.
Water Body |
Permit No. |
Facility Name |
Outfall No. |
Receiving Stream |
River Mile |
Parameter Description |
WLA |
Units WLA |
VAV-B02R |
VA0023281 |
Monterey STP |
001 |
West Strait Creek |
3.85 |
CBOD5 |
11.4 |
KG/D |
VAV-B08R |
VA0065552 |
Opequon Water Reclamation Facility |
001 |
Opequon Creek |
32.66 |
BOD5, JUN-NOV |
207 |
KG/D |
AKA Winchester - Frederick Regional |
CBOD5, DEC-MAY |
1514 |
KG/D |
|||||
VAV-B14R |
VA0025291 |
Fishersville Regional STP |
001 |
Christians Creek |
12.36 |
BOD5 |
182 |
KG/D |
VAV-B23R |
VA0060640 |
North River WWTF AKA Harrisonburg - Rockingham Reg. Sewer Auth. |
001 |
North River |
15.01 |
CBOD5, JAN-MAY |
700 |
KG/D |
CBOD5, JUN-DEC |
800 |
|||||||
TKN, JUN-DEC |
420 |
|||||||
TKN, JAN-MAY |
850 |
|||||||
VAV-B32R |
VA0002160 |
INVISTA - Waynesboro Formerly Dupont - Waynesboro |
001 |
South River |
25.3 |
BOD5 |
272 |
KG/D |
VAV-B32R |
VA0025151 |
Waynesboro STP |
001 |
South River |
23.54 |
CBOD5 |
227 |
KG/D |
CBOD5, JUN-OCT |
113.6 |
KG/D |
||||||
VAV-B32R |
VA0028037 |
Skyline Swannanoa STP |
001 |
South River UT |
2.96 |
BOD5 |
8.5 |
KG/D |
VAV-B35R |
VA0024732 |
Massanutten Public Service STP |
001 |
Quail Run |
5.07 |
BOD5 |
75.7 |
KG/D |
VAV-B37R |
VA0002178 |
Merck & Company |
001 |
S.F. Shenandoah River |
88.09 |
BOD5 |
1570 |
KG/D |
AMMONIA, AS N |
645.9 |
KG/D |
||||||
VAV-B49R |
VA0028380 |
Stoney Creek Sanitary District STP |
001 |
Stoney Creek |
19.87 |
BOD5, JUN-NOV |
29.5 |
KG/D |
VAV-B53R |
VA0020982 |
Middletown STP |
001 |
Meadow Brook |
2.19 |
CBOD5 |
24.0 |
KG/D |
VAV-B58R |
VA0020532 |
Berryville STP |
001 |
Shenandoah River |
24.23 |
CBOD5 |
42.6 |
KG/D |
C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers. The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.
Virginia Waterbody ID |
Discharger Name |
VPDES Permit No. |
Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
B37R |
|
VA0073245 |
54,820 |
4,112 |
B14R |
ACSA - Fishersville Regional |
VA0025291 |
48,729 |
3,655 |
B32R |
|
VA0002160 |
78,941 |
1,009 |
B39R |
Luray |
VA0062642 |
19,492 |
1,462 |
B35R |
Massanutten |
VA0024732 |
18,273 |
1,371 |
B37R |
Merck |
VA0002178 |
43,835 |
4,384 |
B12R |
ACSA - Middle River Regional |
VA0064793 |
82,839 1 |
6,213 2 |
B23R |
North River |
VA0060640 |
|
|
B22R |
|
VA0002313 |
27,410 |
1,371 |
B38R |
|
Formerly VA0001961 |
18,273 |
914 |
B31R |
ACSA - Stuarts Draft WWTP |
VA0066877 |
48,729 |
3,655 |
B32R |
Waynesboro |
VA0025151 |
48,729 1 |
3,655 2 |
B23R |
ACSA - Weyers Cave |
VA0022349 |
6,091 |
457 |
B58R |
Berryville |
VA0020532 |
8,528 |
640 |
B55R |
Front Royal |
VA0062812 |
48,729 1 |
3,655 2 |
B49R |
Georges Chicken LLC |
VA0077402 |
31,065 |
1,553 |
B48R |
Mt. Jackson STP |
VA0026441 |
8,528 |
640 |
B45R |
Broadway Regional WWTF |
VA0090263 |
29,481 |
2,211 |
B49R |
Stoney Creek SD STP |
VA0028380 |
7,309 |
548 |
B51R |
Strasburg STP |
VA0020311 |
11,939 |
895 |
B50R |
Woodstock STP |
VA0026468 |
24,364 |
1,827 |
A06R |
Basham Simms WWTF |
VA0022802 |
18,273 |
1,371 |
A09R |
Broad Run WRF |
VA0091383 |
134,005 1 |
3,350 2 |
A08R |
Leesburg WPCF |
VA0092282 |
121,822 1 |
9,137 2 |
A06R |
Round Hill Town |
VA0026212 |
9,137 |
685 |
A25R |
|
VA0024724 |
42,029 1 |
2,522 2 |
A25R |
|
VA0024678 |
42,029 1 |
2,522 2 |
A25E |
H L Mooney WWTF |
VA0025101 |
219,280 1 |
13,157 2 |
A22R |
UOSA - Centreville |
VA0024988 |
1,315,682 |
16,446 |
A19R |
Vint Hill |
VA0020460 |
11,573 |
868 |
B08R |
Opequon WRF |
VA0065552 |
121,851 1 |
11,512 2 |
B08R |
Parkins |
VA0075191 |
60,911 1 |
4,568 2 |
A13E |
Alexandria Renew Enterprises |
VA0025160 |
493,381 1 |
29,603 2 |
A12E |
Arlington County Water PCF |
VA0025143 |
365,467 1 |
21,928 2 |
A16R |
Noman M Cole Jr |
VA0025364 |
612,158 1 |
36,729 2 |
A12R |
Blue Plains (VA Share) |
DC0021199 |
581,458 |
26,166 |
A26R |
USMC Quantico |
VA0028363 |
20,101 |
1,206 |
A28R |
Aquia |
VA0060968 |
73,093 1 |
4,386 2 |
A31E |
Colonial Beach |
VA0026409 |
18,273 |
1,827 |
A30E |
KGCSA - Dahlgren |
VA0026514 |
9,137 |
914 |
A29E |
|
VA0092134 |
1,827 |
183 |
A30E |
|
VA0021067 |
6,578 |
658 |
A31R |
KGCSA - Purkins Corner |
VA0070106 |
1,096 |
110 |
|
9,137 |
685 |
||
TOTALS: |
|
|
||
Notes:
1Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. 2Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. 3The North River WWTF WLA includes 6,835 lbs/yr of TN and 570 lbs/yr of TP from the consolidation of the McGaheysville STP (VA0072931).
|
A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).
TMDL # |
Stream Name |
TMDL Title |
City/County |
WBID |
Pollutant |
WLA1 |
Units |
1. |
Pheasanty Run |
Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins |
Bath |
I14R |
Organic solids |
1,231.00 |
LB/YR |
2. |
Wallace Mill Stream |
Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins |
Augusta |
I32R |
Organic solids |
2,814.00 |
LB/YR |
3. |
Montebello Sp. Branch |
Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins |
Nelson |
H09R |
Organic solids |
37.00 |
LB/YR |
4. |
Unnamed tributary to Deep Creek |
General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load for Unnamed Tributary to Deep Creek |
Nottoway |
J11R |
Raw sewage |
0 |
GAL/YR |
5. |
Unnamed tributary to Chickahominy River |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Unnamed Tributary to the Chickahominy River |
Hanover |
G05R |
Total phosphorus |
409.35 |
LB/YR |
6. |
Rivanna River |
Benthic TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Watershed |
Albemarle, Greene, Nelson, Orange |
H27R, |
Sediment |
10,229 |
Lbs/Day |
7. |
Jackson River |
Benthic TMDL Development for the Jackson River, Virginia |
Alleghany, Bath, Highland |
I04R, I09R |
Total phosphorus |
72,955 |
LB/GS2 |
8. |
Jackson River |
Benthic TMDL Development for the Jackson River, Virginia |
Alleghany, Bath, Highland |
I04R, I09R |
Total nitrogen |
220,134 |
LB/GS |
9. |
Little Calfpasture |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development to Address a Benthic Impairment in the Little Calfpasture River, Rockbridge County, Virginia |
Rockbridge |
132R |
Sediment |
30.4 |
T/YR |
10. |
Phelps Branch |
Phelps Branch Sediment TMDL Development Report for a Benthic Impairment in Appomattox County, Virginia |
Appomattox |
H06R |
Sediment |
115.7 |
T/YR |
11. |
Long Branch |
Sediment TMDL Development Report for Benthic Impairments in Long Branch and Buffalo River in Amherst County, Virginia |
Amherst |
H11R |
Sediment |
16.2 |
T/YR |
12. |
Buffalo River |
Sediment TMDL Development Report for Benthic Impairments in Long Branch and Buffalo River in Amherst County, Virginia |
Amherst |
H11R |
Sediment |
306.4 |
T/YR |
13. |
Chickahominy River |
Benthic TMDL Development for Chickahominy River, Virginia |
Hanover, Henrico |
G05R |
Sediment |
294.03 |
T/YR |
14. |
Colliers Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River, and Cedar Creek and a Sediment TMDL Development for Colliers Creek |
Rockbridge |
138R |
Sediment |
103.4 |
T/YR |
15. |
Angola Creek (1) - VAC-J06R_ANG01A00 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Cumberland |
J06 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
16. |
Angola Creek (2) - VAC-J06R_ANG02A00 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Cumberland |
J06 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
17. |
Horsepen Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Cumberland |
J06 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
18. |
Little Sandy Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Prince Edward |
J03 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
19. |
Saylers Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Prince Edward |
J06 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
20. |
Spring Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Prince Edward |
J02 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
21. |
West Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Amelia |
J11 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
22. |
Briery Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Prince Edward |
J05 |
E. coli |
3.50E 09 |
cfu/year |
23. |
Bush River (1) - VAC-J04R_BSR02A02 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Prince Edward |
J04, J05 |
E. coli |
3.50E 09 |
cfu/year |
24. |
Bush River (2) - VAC-J03R_BSR03A02 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Prince Edward |
J03, J04, J05 |
E. coli |
3.50E 09 |
cfu/year |
25. |
Swift Creek (1) - VAP-J16R_SFT01A00 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Chesterfield |
J16 |
E. coli |
8.37E 09 |
cfu/year |
26. |
Swift Creek (2) - VAP-J17R_SFT01B98 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Chesterfield |
J16, J17 |
E. coli |
3.24E 11 |
cfu/year |
27. |
Swift Creek (3) - VAP-J17R_SFT01C98 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Chesterfield |
J16, J17 |
E. coli |
4.76E 11 |
cfu/year |
28. |
Flat Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Nottoway, Amelia |
J08, J09 |
E. coli |
5.24E 11 |
cfu/year |
29. |
Nibbs Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Amelia |
J09 |
E. coli |
5.24E 11 |
cfu/year |
30. |
Deep Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Nottoway |
J11 |
E. coli |
8.71E 11 |
cfu/year |
31. |
Appomattox River (1) - VAC-J01R_APP03A02, VAC-J01R_APP04A02, VAC-J01R_APP05A04, VAC-J06R_APP05A02, VAP-J07R_APP01A98, VAP-J10R_APP01A98 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Cumberland, Powhatan, Amelia, Prince Edward, Appomattox |
J01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07 |
E. coli |
1.07E 13 |
cfu/year |
32. |
Appomattox River (2), lower - VAP-J15R_APP01A98 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Chesterfield, Cumberland, Powhatan, Nottoway, Amelia, Dinwiddie, Prince Edward, Appomattox |
J01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07, J08, J09, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, J15 |
E. coli |
1.66E 13 |
cfu/year |
33. |
Appomattox River and tributaries, lower tidal (3) - VAP-J15E_APP01A98, VAP-J15E_APP02A98, VAP-J15E_APP02B12 |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin |
Chesterfield, Cumberland, Nottoway, Petersburg, Amelia, Colonial Heights, Prince Edward, Appomattox |
J01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07, J08, J09, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, J15, J16, J17 |
E. coli |
7.47E 13 |
cfu/year |
34. |
Bear Garden Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Bear Garden Creek Watershed |
Buckingham |
H20 |
E. coli |
3.15E 08 |
cfu/day |
35. |
Stonewall Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek |
Appomattox |
H05 |
E. coli |
9.28E 10 |
cfu/year |
36. |
Bent Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek |
Appomattox |
H07 |
E. coli |
2.26E 11 |
cfu/year |
37. |
North Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek |
Appomattox |
H06 |
E. coli |
2.96E 11 |
cfu/year |
38. |
Wreck Island Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek |
Appomattox |
H06 |
E. coli |
8.76E 11 |
cfu/year |
39. |
Walkers Ford Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek |
Amherst |
H05 |
E. coli |
8.90E 11 |
cfu/year |
40. |
Bleakhorn Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments |
Suffolk |
G13 |
Fecal coliform |
2.66E 09 |
MPN/day |
41. |
Knotts Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments |
Suffolk |
G13 |
Fecal coliform |
1.07E 10 |
MPN/day |
42. |
Bennett Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments |
Suffolk |
G13 |
Fecal coliform |
6.37E 10 |
MPN/day |
43. |
Chickahominy River and tributaries |
E. coli TMDL Development for Chickahominy River and Tributaries |
New Kent, Henrico, Charles City, Hanover |
G05, G06, G07 |
E. coli |
2.41E 12 |
cfu/year |
44. |
Chuckatuck Creek and Brewers Creek |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Chuckatuck Creek and Brewers Creek Watershed |
Isle of Wight |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
4.79E 11 |
MPN/day |
45. |
Paradise Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed |
Portsmouth |
G15 |
Enterococci |
5.04E 11 |
cfu/day |
46. |
Lafayette River, upper |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed |
Norfolk |
G15 |
Enterococci |
1.05E 13 |
cfu/day |
47. |
Lower and Upper Western Branch, Elizabeth River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed |
Chesapeake, Portsmouth |
G15 |
Enterococci |
2.00E 13 |
cfu/day |
48. |
Upper Mainstem, Lower Southern Branch, Lower Eastern Branch Elizabeth River, Broad Creek, Indian River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed |
Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Norfolk |
G15, K39 |
Enterococci |
5.78E 13 |
cfu/day |
49. |
Fourmile Creek |
Bacteria TMDL for Fourmile Creek |
Henrico |
G02 |
E. coli |
3.99E 10 |
cfu/year |
50. |
Hardware River, North Fork |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North Fork Hardware River and Hardware River |
Albemarle |
H18 |
E. coli |
0.06E 12 |
cfu/year |
51. |
Hardware River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North Fork Hardware River and Hardware River |
Fluvanna, Albemarle |
H18, H19 |
E. coli |
0.02E 13 |
cfu/year |
52. |
Walker Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek |
Rockbridge |
I34 |
E. coli |
6.00E 10 |
cfu/year |
53. |
Otts Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek |
Augusta |
I34 |
E. coli |
9.00E 10 |
cfu/year |
54. |
Hays Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek |
Rockbridge |
I34 |
E. coli |
2.00E 11 |
cfu/year |
55. |
Hoffler Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Hoffler Creek Watershed |
Portsmouth |
G15 |
Enterococci |
5.39E 11 |
cfu/day |
56. |
Powell Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover |
Prince George |
G03 |
E. coli |
6.12E 10 |
cfu/year |
57. |
Bailey Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover |
Prince George |
G03 |
E. coli |
1.62E 11 |
cfu/year |
58. |
Bailey Bay, Bailey Creek, Cattail Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover |
Prince George, Hopewell |
G03 |
E. coli |
8.47E 12 |
cfu/year |
59. |
James River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover |
Prince George, Charles City, Hopewell |
G03 |
E. coli |
8.67E 14 |
cfu/year |
60. |
Austin Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H21 |
E. coli |
1.62E 10 |
cfu/year |
61. |
Fisby Branch |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H21 |
E. coli |
2.15E 10 |
cfu/year |
62. |
Rock Island Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H17 |
E. coli |
3.38E 10 |
cfu/year |
63. |
Slate River, upper |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H21 |
E. coli |
4.22E 10 |
cfu/year |
64. |
Troublesome Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H21 |
E. coli |
5.23E 10 |
cfu/year |
65. |
North River |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H21 |
E. coli |
5.52E 10 |
cfu/year |
66. |
Ballinger Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Albemarle |
H17 |
E. coli |
5.75E 10 |
cfu/year |
67. |
Totier Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Albemarle |
H17 |
E. coli |
1.62E 11 |
cfu/year |
68. |
Slate River, lower |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin |
Buckingham |
H21, H22 |
E. coli |
3.19E 12 |
cfu/year |
69. |
Fine Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region |
Powhatan |
H38 |
E. coli |
3.66E 10 |
cfu/year |
70. |
Big Lickinghole Creek, Little Lickinghole Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region |
Goochland |
H37 |
E. coli |
7.94E 10 |
cfu/year |
71. |
Byrd Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region |
Goochland, Fluvanna |
H34 |
E. coli |
1.08E 11 |
cfu/year |
72. |
Upper James River |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region |
Cumberland, Fluvanna, Powhatan, Goochland |
H33, H34, H37 |
E. coli |
3.50E 11 |
cfu/year |
73. |
Beaverdam Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region |
Goochland |
H38 |
E. coli |
1.60E 12 |
cfu/year |
74. |
James River, lower |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region |
Cumberland, Fluvanna, Powhatan, Goochland |
H33, H34, H37, H38 |
E. coli |
8.20E 12 |
cfu/year |
75. |
No Name Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Chesterfield |
G01 |
E. coli |
4.66E 11 |
cfu/year |
76. |
Bernards Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Powhatan |
H39 |
E. coli |
1.67E 12 |
cfu/year |
77. |
Goode Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Richmond City |
G01 |
E. coli |
2.52E 12 |
cfu/year |
78. |
Gillies Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Henrico, Richmond City |
G01 |
E. coli |
2.93E 12 |
cfu/year |
79. |
Powhite Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Chesterfield |
H39 |
E. coli |
3.34E 12 |
cfu/year |
80. |
Almond Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Henrico |
G01 |
E. coli |
4.39E 12 |
cfu/year |
81. |
Falling Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Chesterfield, Richmond City |
G01 |
E. coli |
1.64E 13 |
cfu/year |
82. |
Reedy Creek |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Richmond City |
H39 |
E. coli |
8.23E 13 |
cfu/year |
83. |
James River, tidal |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Henrico, Richmond City, Goochland, Powhatan, Chesterfield |
G01, G02, H39 |
E. coli |
3.76E 14 |
cfu/year |
84. |
James River, lower |
Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond |
Henrico, Richmond City, Goochland, Powhatan, Chesterfield |
H39 |
E. coli |
3.06E 15 |
cfu/year |
85. |
Ivy Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Lynchburg, Bedford |
H03 |
E. coli |
4.07E 12 |
cfu/year |
86. |
Burton Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Lynchburg, Campbell |
H03 |
E. coli |
3.47E 12 |
cfu/year |
87. |
Judith Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Lynchburg, Bedford |
H03 |
E. coli |
3.26E 11 |
cfu/year |
88. |
Tomahawk Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Bedford, Campbell, Lynchburg |
H03 |
E. coli |
1.01E 12 |
cfu/year |
89. |
Fishing Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Lynchburg |
H03 |
E. coli |
3.76E 13 |
cfu/year |
90. |
Blackwater Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Lynchburg |
H03 |
E. coli |
3.61E 14 |
cfu/year |
91. |
James River, lower |
E.coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Amherst, Bedford, Campbell, Lynchburg |
H03, H05 |
E. coli |
1.33E 15 |
cfu/year |
92. |
Baptist Run |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River |
York |
G11 |
E. coli |
3.89E 09 |
cfu/year |
93. |
Deep Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River |
Newport News |
G11, C07 |
Enterococci |
5.59E 12 |
cfu/year |
94. |
Skiffes Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River |
James City |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
2.46E 12 |
cfu/year |
95. |
James River, Warwick River |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River |
Newport News, York |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
3.04E 12 |
cfu/year |
96. |
Kings Creek and Bay |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Kings Creek and Bay and Ballard Creek and Bay Watersheds |
Isle of Wight |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
1.23E 09 |
counts/day |
97. |
Ballard Creek and Bay |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Kings Creek and Bay and Ballard Creek and Bay Watersheds |
Isle of Wight |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
1.64E 09 |
counts/day |
98. |
Lawnes Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Lawnes Creek Bacterial Impairment |
Surry |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
5.94E 08 |
MPN/day |
99. |
Looney Creek |
Bacteria TMDL for Looney Creek |
Botetourt |
I26 |
E. coli |
1.84E 10 |
cfu/year |
100. |
Buffalo Creek, South Fork |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek |
Botetourt, Rockbridge |
I38 |
E. coli |
2.01E 11 |
cfu/year |
101. |
Colliers Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek |
Rockbridge |
I38 |
E. coli |
4.75E 11 |
cfu/year |
102. |
Cedar Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek |
Rockbridge |
I28 |
E. coli |
5.01E 11 |
cfu/year |
103. |
Buffalo Creek, North Fork |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek |
Rockbridge |
I38 |
E. coli |
6.52E 11 |
cfu/year |
104. |
Buffalo Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek |
Rockbridge |
I38 |
E. coli |
1.91E 12 |
cfu/year |
105. |
Maury River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek |
Buena Vista, Rockbridge |
I37, I38 |
E. coli |
2.98E 13 |
cfu/year |
106. |
Powhatan Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek |
James City |
G10 |
E. coli |
1.78E 13 |
cfu/year |
107. |
Mill Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek |
James City |
G10 |
Enterococci |
3.63E 12 |
cfu/year |
108. |
Powhatan Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek |
James City |
G10 |
Enterococci |
7.24E 12 |
cfu/year |
109. |
Moores Creek |
Development of the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Moore's Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia |
Charlottesville, Albemarle |
H28 |
Fecal coliform |
3.30E 13 |
cfu/year |
110. |
Morris Creek |
Morris Creek (tidal), Charles City County Total Maximum Daily Load for Bacteria Contamination Impaired for Recreational Use |
Charles City |
G08 |
Enterococci |
2.92E 10 |
cfu/day |
111. |
Shingle Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River |
Suffolk |
G13, K39 |
Fecal coliform |
2.78E 09 |
cfu/year |
112. |
Nansemond River, upper and middle |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River |
Isle of Wight, Suffolk |
G12, G13, G14 |
Fecal coliform |
3.89E 10 |
cfu/year |
113. |
Shingle Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River |
Suffolk |
G13, K39 |
Enterococci |
2.19E 10 |
cfu/year |
114. |
Nansemond River, upper |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River |
Isle of Wight, Suffolk |
G12, G13, G14 |
Enterococci |
9.99E 10 |
cfu/year |
115. |
Nansemond River (Lake Meade) |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River |
Suffolk |
G12, G13 |
Enterococci |
9.99E 10 |
cfu/year |
116. |
Pagan River, middle and upper |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Pagan River |
Isle of Wight |
G11 |
Enterococci |
3.01E 12 |
cfu/year |
117. |
Pagan River and Jones Creek |
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Pagan River |
Isle of Wight |
G11 |
Fecal coliform |
2.15E 12 |
cfu/year |
118. |
Reed Creek, lower |
Bacteria TMDL for Reed Creek |
Bedford |
H01 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
119. |
Beaver Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds |
Albemarle |
H23 |
E. coli |
3.29E 10 |
cfu/year |
120. |
Mechums River |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds |
Albemarle |
H23 |
E. coli |
3.31E 10 |
cfu/year |
121. |
Preddy Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds |
Greene, Albemarle |
H27 |
E. coli |
2.43E 11 |
cfu/year |
122. |
Rivanna River, North Fork |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds |
Greene, Albemarle |
H27 |
E. coli |
2.15E 12 |
cfu/year |
123. |
Meadow Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds |
Charlottesville |
H28 |
E. coli |
3.89E 12 |
cfu/year |
124. |
Rivanna River |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds |
Charlottesville, Albemarle, Greene |
H23, H24, H25, H26, H27, H28 |
E. coli |
4.93E 12 |
cfu/year |
125. |
Rockfish River, North Fork |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River |
Nelson |
H15 |
E. coli |
8.44E 11 |
cfu/year |
126. |
Rockfish River, South Fork |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River |
Nelson |
H15 |
E. coli |
4.40E 12 |
cfu/year |
127. |
Rockfish River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River |
Nelson |
H15, H16 |
E. coli |
5.76E 12 |
cfu/year |
128. |
Tuckahoe Creek and tributaries |
Bacteria TMDL for Tuckahoe Creek, Little Tuckahoe Creek, Anderson, Broad, Georges and Readers Branches, and Deep Run |
Henrico, Goochland |
H39 |
E. coli |
1.05E 13 |
cfu/year |
129. |
Turner Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Amherst |
H12 |
E. coli |
1.57E 11 |
cfu/year |
130. |
Mill Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Amherst |
H11 |
E. coli |
2.08E 11 |
cfu/year |
131. |
Hat Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Nelson |
H09 |
E. coli |
6.02E 11 |
cfu/year |
132. |
Rutledge Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Amherst |
H12 |
E. coli |
1.15E 12 |
cfu/year |
133. |
Rucker Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Nelson |
H13 |
E. coli |
1.32E 12 |
cfu/year |
134. |
Piney River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Amherst, Nelson |
H10 |
E. coli |
2.44E 12 |
cfu/year |
135. |
Buffalo River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Amherst |
H11, H12 |
E. coli |
2.54E 12 |
cfu/year |
136. |
Tye River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River |
Amherst, Nelson |
H09, H10, H11, H12, H13 |
E. coli |
1.33E 13 |
cfu/year |
137. |
Upham Brook and tributaries |
Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upham Brook Watershed |
Henrico, Richmond City |
G05 |
E. coli |
8.04E 10 |
cfu/year |
138. |
White Oak Swamp |
Bacteria TMDL for White Oak Swamp |
Henrico |
G06 |
E. coli |
1.58E 12 |
cfu/year |
139. |
Willis River and tributaries |
Fecal coliform TMDL Development for Willis River |
Cumberland, Buckingham |
H35, H36 |
Fecal coliform |
3.15E 11 |
cfu/year |
140. |
North Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the North Creek Watershed |
Fluvanna |
H20R |
Sediment |
7.29 |
tons/yr |
141. |
North Creek |
Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the North Creek Watershed |
Fluvanna |
H20R |
Total phosphorus |
187.3 |
lbs/yr |
142. |
Turkey Island Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed |
Henrico, Charles City |
G02R |
E. coli |
4.31E 11 |
cfu/year |
143. |
James River from Westover to Chippokes Point |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed |
Charles City, Prince George |
G02R, G04R |
E. coli |
4.25E 13 |
cfu/year |
144. |
James River from Chippokes Point to Claremont |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed |
Prince George, Surry |
G04E, G04R |
E. coli |
4.99E 13 |
cfu/year |
145. |
Moores Creek |
Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch |
Albemarle, |
H28 |
Sediment |
809.48 |
tons/yr |
146. |
Lodge Creek |
Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch |
Albemarle, |
H28 |
Sediment |
46.25 |
tons/yr |
147. |
Meadow Creek |
Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch |
Albemarle, |
H28 |
Sediment |
452.33 |
tons/yr |
148. |
Schenks Branch |
Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch |
City of Charlottesville |
H28 |
Sediment |
134.52 |
tons/yr |
149. |
James River, upper |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Amherst, Bedford |
H01R, I28R |
E. coli |
2.27E 11 |
cfu/year |
150. |
Beaver Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Campbell |
H05R |
E. coli |
3.26E 11 |
cfu/year |
151. |
Pedlar River |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Amherst |
H02R |
E. coli |
7.86E 11 |
cfu/year |
152. |
Harris Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA |
Amherst |
H04R |
E. coli |
1.02E 13 |
cfu/year |
153. |
Diascund Creek, nontidal |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
New Kent |
G09R |
E. coli |
2.51E 11 |
cfu/year |
154. |
Beaverdam Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
New Kent |
G09R |
E. coli |
1.27E 11 |
cfu/year |
155. |
Unnamed tributary to Beaverdam Creek (SAH) |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
New Kent |
G09R |
E. coli |
4.52E 10 |
cfu/year |
156. |
Barrows Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
Charles City |
G08R |
E. coli |
6.90E 10 |
cfu/year |
157. |
Mill Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
James City |
G08R |
E. coli |
9.90E 11 |
cfu/year |
158. |
Diascund Creek, tidal |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
New Kent, James City |
G08E |
Enterococci |
7.12E 12 |
cfu/year |
159. |
Chickahominy River |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
New Kent, James City, Charles City |
G08E |
Enterococci |
9.57E 13 |
cfu/year |
160. |
Gordon Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA |
James City |
G08E |
Enterococci |
6.15E 12 |
cfu/year |
161. |
Woods Creek |
Bacteria TMDL Development and a Proactive Approach to Address the Benthic Impairment for Woods Creek, Rockbridge County and City of Lexington, Virginia |
Rockbridge, City of Lexington |
I35R |
E.coli |
3.97E 11 |
cfu/year |
162. |
Sinking Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I18R |
E. coli |
1.17E 9 |
counts/year |
163. |
Barbours Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Craig |
I22R |
E. coli |
2.36E 9 |
counts/year |
164. |
Lapsley Run |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I24R |
E. coli |
2.45E 8 |
counts/year |
165. |
Little Patterson Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I22R |
E. coli |
5.38E 8 |
counts/year |
166. |
Upper Craig Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Craig |
I19R |
E. coli |
3.93E 9 |
counts/year |
167. |
Middle Craig Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Craig |
I22R |
E. coli |
1.54E 10 |
counts/year |
168. |
Lower Craig Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I22R |
E. coli |
2.07E 10 |
counts/year |
169. |
Catawba Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I25R |
E. coli |
3.00E 9 |
counts/year |
170. |
James River |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I18R |
E. coli |
4.19E 10 |
counts/year |
171. |
Catawba Creek |
Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia |
Botetourt |
I25R |
Sediment |
29.44 |
tons/year |
172. |
Bullpasture River |
Bacteria TMDL Development for the Bullpasture River in Highland County, Virginia |
Highland |
I13R |
E. coli |
2.63E 12 |
counts/year |
173. |
Blue Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
20,750 |
lbs/year |
174. |
Marsh Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
5,210 |
lbs/year |
175. |
Preddy Creek |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
105,600 |
lbs/year |
176. |
Preddy Creek North Branch |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
47,940 |
lbs/year |
177. |
Quarter Creek |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
11,020 |
lbs/year |
178. |
Standardsville Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
6,105 |
lbs/year |
179. |
Swift Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
89,130 |
lbs/year |
180. |
Unnamed tributary to Flat Branch |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Sediment |
27,890 |
lbs/year |
181. |
Blue Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Total Phosphorus |
21.8 |
lbs/year |
182. |
Standardsville Run |
Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties |
Albemarle, Greene, Orange |
H27R |
Total Phosphorus |
4.6 |
lbs/year |
Notes: 2GS means growing season. |
B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.
TABLE B1 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN RECOMMENDED SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION |
||||
Stream Name |
Segment No. |
Mile to Mile |
Classification |
Comments |
Maury River |
2-4 |
80.3-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries |
James River |
2-5 |
271.5-266.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
James River |
2-6 |
266.0-115.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries except Tye & Rivanna River |
Tye River |
2-7 |
41.7-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries except Rutledge Creek |
Rutledge Creek |
2-8 |
3.0-0.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
Piney River |
2-9 |
20.6-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries |
Rivanna River |
2-10 |
20.0-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries |
Rivanna River |
2-11 |
38.1-20.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
Rivanna River |
2-12 |
76.7-38.1 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries |
S.F. Rivanna River |
2-13 |
12.2-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries |
Mechums River |
2-14 |
23.1-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries |
N.F. Rivanna River |
2-15 |
17.0-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries except Standardsville Run |
Standardsville Run |
2-16 |
1.2-0.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
Appomattox River |
2-17 |
156.2-27.7 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries except Buffalo Creek, Courthouse Branch, and Deep Creek |
Buffalo Creek |
2-18 |
20.9-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries except unnamed tributary @ R.M. 9.3 |
Unnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek @ R.M. 9.3 |
2-19 |
1.3-0.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
Courthouse Branch |
2-20 |
0.6-0.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
Deep Creek |
2-21 |
29.5-0.0 |
E.L. |
Main & tributaries except unnamed tributary @ R.M. 25.0 |
Unnamed tributary of Deep Creek @ R.M. 25.0 |
2-22 |
2.2-0.0 |
W.Q. |
Main only |
TABLE B2 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN LOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT7 |
|||||||
Stream Name |
Segment Number |
Classification |
Mile to Mile |
Significant Discharges |
Total Assimilative Capacity of Stream BOD5 lbs/day |
Wasteload Allocation BOD5 lbs/day2 |
Reserve BOD5 lbs/day5 |
Cedar Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
1.9-0.0 |
Natural Bridge, Inc. STP |
35.0 |
28.0 |
7.0 (20%) |
Elk Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
2.8-0.0 |
Natural Bridge Camp for Boys STP |
7.0 |
3.3 |
3.7 (53%) |
Little Calfpasture River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
10.9-4.0 |
Craigsville |
12.0 |
9.6 |
2.4 (20%) |
Cabin River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
1.7-0.0 |
Millboro |
Self -sustaining |
None |
None |
Maury River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
19.6-12.2 |
Lexington STP |
380.0 |
380.0 |
None |
Maury River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
12.2-1.2 |
Georgia Bonded Fibers |
760.0 |
102.03 |
238.0 (31%) |
Buena Vista STP |
420.0 |
||||||
Maury River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
1.2-0.0 |
Lees Carpets |
790.0 |
425.03 |
290.0 (37%) |
Glasgow STP |
75.0 |
||||||
James River |
2-5 |
W.Q. |
271.5-266.0 |
Owens-Illinois |
4,640.0 |
4,640.03 |
None |
James River |
2-6 |
E.L. |
257.5-231.0 |
Lynchburg STP |
10,100.0 |
8,000.0 |
2,060.0 (20%) |
Babcock & Wilcox-NNFD |
40.03 |
||||||
James River |
2-6 |
E.L. |
231.0-202.0 |
Virginia Fibre |
3,500.0 |
3,500.0 |
None |
Rutledge Creek |
2-8 |
W.Q. |
3.0-0.0 |
Amherst STP |
46.0 |
37.0 |
9.0 (20%) |
Town Creek |
2-7 |
E.L. |
2.1-0.0 |
Lovingston STP |
26.0 |
21.0 |
5.0 (20%) |
Ivy Creek |
2-6 |
E.L. |
0.1-0.0 |
Schuyler |
13.8 |
11.0 |
2.8 (20%) |
James River |
2-6 |
E.L. |
186.0-179.0 |
Uniroyal, Inc. |
1,400.0 |
19.36 |
1,336.0 (95%) |
Scottsville STP |
45.0 |
||||||
North Creek |
2-6 |
E.L. |
3.1-0.0 |
Fork Union STP |
31.0 |
25.0 |
6.0 (20%) |
Howells Branch and Lickinghole Creek |
2-14 |
E.L. |
0.7-0.0 |
Morton Frozen Foods |
20.0 |
20.03 |
None |
Standardsville Run |
2-16 |
W.Q. |
1.2-0.0 |
Standardsville STP |
17.9 |
14.3 |
3.6 (20%) |
Rivanna River |
2-11 |
W.Q. |
23.5-20.0 |
Lake Monticello STP |
480.0 |
380.0 |
100.0 (20%) |
Rivanna River |
2-10 |
E.L. |
15.0-0.0 |
Palmyra |
250.0 |
4.0 |
158.0 (63%) |
Schwarzenbach Huber |
88.03 |
||||||
Unnamed tributary of Whispering Creek |
2-6 |
E.L. |
1.2-0.0 |
Dillwyn STP |
38.0 |
30.0 |
8.0 (21%) |
South Fork Appomattox River |
2-17 |
E.L. |
5.5-0.0 |
Appomattox Lagoon |
18.8 |
15.0 |
3.8 (20%) |
Unnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek |
2-19 |
W.Q. |
1.3-0.0 |
Hampden-Sydney Coll. STP |
10.0 |
8.0 |
2.0 (20%) |
Appomattox River |
2-17 |
E.L. |
106.1-88.0 |
Farmville STP |
280.0 |
220.0 |
60.0 (21%) |
Unnamed tributary of Little Guinea Creek |
2-17 |
E.L. |
2.5-1.3 |
Cumberland H.S. Lagoon |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.1 (20%) |
Unnamed tributary of Tear Wallet Creek |
2-17 |
E.L. |
0.68-0.0 |
Cumberland Courthouse |
8.8 |
7.0 |
1.8 (20%) |
Courthouse Branch |
2-22 |
W.Q. |
2.2-0.0 |
Amelia STP |
21.0 |
17.0 |
4.0 (20%) |
Unnamed tributary of Deep Creek |
2-22 |
W.Q. |
2.2-0.0 |
Crewe STP |
50.311,12 |
50.111, 12 |
0.2 (0.4%)11,12,13 |
Notes: 2Based on 2020 loads or stream assimilative capacity less 20%. 3Load allocation based on published NPDES permits. 4This assimilative capacity is based upon an ammonia loading no greater than 125.1 lbs/day. 5Percentages refer to reserve as percent of total assimilative capacity. Minimum reserve for future growth and modeling accuracy is 20% unless otherwise noted. 6No NPDES Permits published (BPT not established) allocation base on maximum value monitored. 7This table is for the existing discharge point. The recommended plan may involve relocation or elimination of stream discharge. 8Assimilative capacity will be determined upon completion of the ongoing study by Hydroscience, Inc. 9Discharges into Karnes Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River. 10Discharges into Wilson Creek, near its confluence with Jackson River. 11Five-day Carbonaceous Biological Oxygen Demand (cBOD5). 12Revision supersedes all subsequent Crewe STP stream capacity, allocation, and reserve references. 130.4% reserve: determined by SWCB Piedmont Regional Office. Source: Wiley & Wilson, Inc. |
TABLE B3 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN ADDITIONAL LOAD ALLOCATIONS |
|||||||
Stream Name |
Segment Number |
Classification1 |
Significant Discharges |
Total Assimilative Capacity of Stream BOD5 lbs/day |
Wasteload2 Allocation BOD5 lbs/day |
Reserve4 BOD5 lbs/day5 |
|
Mill Creek |
2-4 |
E.L. |
5.5-0.0 |
Millboro |
30.0 |
7.3 |
22.7 (76%) |
Calfpasture River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
4.9-0.0 |
Goshen |
65.0 |
12.0 |
53.0 (82%) |
Maury River |
2-4 |
E.L. |
1.2-0.0 |
Lees Carpet |
790.0 |
425.03 |
235.0 (30%) |
Glasgow Regional STP |
130.0 |
||||||
Buffalo River |
2-7 |
E.L. |
9.6-0.0 |
Amherst STP |
150.0 |
120.0 |
30.0 (20%) |
Rockfish River |
2-6 |
E.L. |
9.5-0.0 |
Schuyler STP |
110.0 |
25.0 |
85.0 (77%) |
Standardsville Run |
E.L. |
Standardsville |
Land Application Recommended |
||||
South Fork Appomattox River |
E.L. |
Appomattox Lagoon |
Connect to Recommended Facility in Roanoke River Basin |
||||
Buffalo Creek |
2-17 |
E.L. |
9.3-7.7 |
Hampden-Sydney College |
46.0 |
23.0 |
23.0 (50%) |
Unnamed tributary of Tear Wallet Creek |
E.L. |
Cumberland Courthouse |
Land Application Recommended |
||||
Courthouse Branch |
E.L. |
Amelia |
Land Application Recommended |
||||
Deep Creek |
2-17 |
E.L. |
25.0-12.8 |
Crewe STP |
69.0 |
55.0 |
14.0 (20%) |
Notes: 2Based on 2020 loads or stream assimilative capacity less 20%. 3Load allocation based on published NPDES permit. 4Percentages refer to reserve as percent of total assimilative capacity. Minimum reserve for future growth and modeling accuracy is 20% unless otherwise noted. 5Assimilative capacity will be determined upon completion of the ongoing study by Hydroscience, Inc. Source: Wiley & Wilson, Inc. |
TABLE B4 - SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION UPPER JAMES-JACKSON RIVER SUBAREA |
||||
Stream Name |
Segment Number |
Mile to Mile |
Stream Classification |
Comments |
Back Creek |
2-1 |
16.06-8.46 |
W.Q. |
Main Only |
Jackson River |
2-1 |
95.70-24.90 |
E.L. |
Main and Tributaries |
Jackson River |
2-2 |
24.90-0.00 |
W.Q. |
Main Only |
Jackson River |
2-2 |
24.90-0.00 |
E.L. |
Tributaries Only |
James River |
2-3 |
349.50-308.50 |
E.L. |
Main and Tributaries |
James River |
2-3 |
308.50-279.41 |
E.L. |
Main and Tributaries |
TABLE B5 - UPPER JAMES-JACKSON RIVER SUBAREA WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT1 |
||||||||
MAP LOCATION |
STREAM NAME |
SEGMENT NUMBER |
SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION STANDARDS |
MILE to2 MILE |
DISCHARGER |
VPDES PERMIT NUMBER |
VPDES PERMIT LIMITS BOD5 kg/day |
303(e)3 WASTELOAD ALLOCATION BOD5 kg/day |
1 |
Jackson River |
2-1 |
E.L. |
93.05- |
Virginia Trout |
VA0071722 |
N/A |
Secondary |
B |
Warm Springs Run |
2-1 |
E.L. |
3.62-0.00 |
Warm Springs STP |
VA0028233 |
9.10 |
Secondary |
3 |
Back Creek |
2-1 |
W.Q. |
16.06-8.46 |
VEPCO |
VA0053317 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
C |
X-trib to Jackson River |
2-1 |
E.L. |
0.40-0.0 |
Bacova |
VA0024091 |
9.10 |
Secondary |
D |
Hot Springs Run |
2-1 |
E.L. |
5.30-0.00 |
Hot Springs Reg. STP |
VA0066303 |
51.10 |
Secondary |
E |
X-trib to Cascades Creek |
2-1 |
E.L. |
3.00-0.00 |
Ashwood-Healing Springs STP |
VA0023726 |
11.30 |
Secondary |
F |
Jackson River |
2-1 |
E.L. |
50.36- |
U.S. Forest Service Bolar Mountain |
VA0032123 |
1.98 |
Secondary |
G |
Jackson River |
2-1 |
E.L. |
43.55 |
U.S. Army COE Morris Hill Complex |
VA0032115 |
1.70 |
Secondary |
H |
Jackson River |
2-1 |
E.L. |
29.84- |
Alleghany County Clearwater Park |
VA0027955 |
5.70 |
Secondary |
4 |
Jackson River |
2-1 |
E.L. |
25.99 |
Covington City Water Treatment Plant |
VA0058491 |
N/A |
Secondary |
5 |
Jackson River |
2-2 |
W.Q. |
24.64-19.03 |
Westvaco |
VA0003646 |
4,195.00 |
4,195.004 |
6 |
Covington City5 Asphalt Plant |
VA0054411 |
N/A |
N/A |
||||
7 |
Hercules, Inc6 |
VA0003450 |
94.00 |
94.00 |
||||
J |
Jackson River |
2-2 |
W.Q. |
19.03-10.5 |
Covington STP |
VA0025542 |
341.00 |
341.00 |
K |
Jackson River |
10.5-0.0 |
Low Moor STP7 |
VA0027979 |
22.70 |
22.70 |
||
M |
D.S. Lancaster CC8 |
VA0028509 |
3.60 |
3.60 |
||||
L |
Selma STP9 |
VA0028002 |
59.00 |
59.00 |
||||
10 |
The Chessie System10 |
VA0003344 |
N/A |
N/A |
||||
N |
Clifton Forge STP11 |
VA0002984 |
227.00 |
227.00 |
||||
11 |
Lydall12 |
VA0002984 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
||||
P |
Iron Gate STP13 |
VA0020541 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
||||
8 |
Paint Bank Branch |
2-2 |
E.L. |
1.52 |
VDGIF Paint Bank Hatchery |
VA0098432 |
N/A |
Secondary |
I |
Jerrys Run |
2-2 |
E.L. |
6.72- |
VDOT 1-64 Rest Area |
VA0023159 |
0.54 |
Secondary |
AA |
East Branch (Sulfer Spring) |
2-2 |
E.L. |
2.16 |
Norman F. Nicholas |
VA0078403 |
0.05 |
Secondary |
BB |
East Branch (Sulfer Spring) |
2-2 |
E.L. |
1.91- |
Daryl C. Clark |
VA0067890 |
0.068 |
Secondary |
9 |
Smith Creek |
2-2 |
E.L. |
3.44- |
Clifton Forge Water Treatment Plant |
VA0006076 |
N/A |
Secondary |
O |
Wilson Creek |
2-2 |
E.L. |
0.20-0.0 |
Cliftondale14 Park STP |
VA0027987 |
24.00 |
Secondary |
2 |
Pheasanty Run |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.01- |
Coursey Springs |
VA0006491 |
434.90 |
Secondary |
Q |
Grannys Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
1.20- |
Craig Spring Conference Grounds |
VA0027952 |
3.40 |
Secondary |
CC |
X-trib to Big Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
1.10- |
Homer Kelly Residence |
VA0074926 |
0.05 |
Secondary |
12 |
Mill Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.16- |
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. |
VA0004839 |
N/A |
Secondary |
R |
John Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.20- |
New Castle STP (old) |
VA0024139 |
21.00 |
Secondary |
S |
Craig Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
48.45-36.0 |
New Castle STP (new) |
VA0064599 |
19.90 |
Secondary |
T |
Craig Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
46.98- |
Craig County Schools McCleary E.S. |
VA0027758 |
0.57 |
Secondary |
DD |
Eagle Rock Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.08- |
Eagle Rock STP15 (Proposed) |
VA0076350 |
2.30 |
Secondary |
U |
X-trib to Catawba Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.16 |
VDBHDS Catawba Hospital |
VA0029475 |
13.60 |
Secondary |
14 |
Catawba Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
23.84 |
Tarmac-Lonestar |
VA0078393 |
0.80 |
Secondary |
FF |
Borden Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
2.00- |
Shenandoah Baptist Church Camp |
VA0075451 |
0.88 |
Secondary |
EE |
X-trib to Borden Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.36 |
David B. Pope |
VA0076031 |
0.07 |
Secondary |
V |
X-trib to Catawba Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
3.21- |
U.S. FHA Flatwood Acres |
VA0068233 |
0.03 |
Secondary |
W |
Catawba Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
11.54- |
Fincastle STP |
VA0068233 |
8.50 |
Secondary |
X |
Looney Mill Creek |
2-3 |
E.L. |
1.83- |
VDOT I-81 Rest Area |
VA0060364 |
0.91 |
Secondary |
Y |
X-trib to Stoney |
2-3 |
E.L. |
0.57 |
VDOC Field Unit No. 25 Battle Creek |
VA0023523 |
1.10 |
Secondary |
Z |
James River |
2-3 |
E.L. |
308.-286.0 |
Buchanan STP |
VA0022225 |
27.00 |
Secondary |
Notes: N/A Currently No BOD5 limits or wasteload have been imposed by the VPDES permit. Should BOD5 limits (wasteload) be imposed a WQMP amendment would be required for water quality limited segments only. 1Secondary treatment levels are required in effluent limiting (E.L.) segments. In water quality limiting (W.Q.) segments quantities listed represent wasteload allocations. 2Ending river miles have not been determined for some effluent limited segments. 3These allocations represent current and original (1977 WQMP) modeling. Future revisions may be necessary based on Virginia State Water Control Board modeling. 4The total assimilative capacity at critical stream flow for this portion of Segment 2-2 has been modeled and verified by Hydroscience, Inc. (March 1977) to be 4,914 kg/day BOD5. 5The discharge is to an unnamed tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 22.93. 6The discharge is at Jackson River mile 19.22. 7The discharge is to the mouth of Karnes Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 5.44. 8The discharge is at Jackson River mile 6.67. 9The discharge is at Jackson River mile 5.14. 10The discharge is at Jackson River mile 4.72. 11The discharge is at Jackson River mile 3.46. 12The discharge is at Jackson River mile 1.17. 13The discharge is at Jackson River mile 0.76. 14The discharge is to the mouth of Wilson Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 2.44. 15The discharge is to the mouth of Eagle Rock Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 330.35. |
||||||||
TABLE B6 - RICHMOND CRATER INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS - JAMES RIVER BASIN |
|||
SEGMENT |
SEGMENT NUMBER |
MILE TO MILE |
CLASSIFICATION |
USGS HUC02080206 James River |
2-19 |
115.0-60.5 |
W.Q. |
USGS HUC02080207 Appomattox |
2-23 |
30.1-0.0 |
W.Q. |
Notes: |
TABLE B7 - RICHMOND CRATER INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN – CURRENT PERMITTED WASTELOADS (March 1988) |
|||||||||||||
SUMMER (June-October) |
WINTER (November-May) |
||||||||||||
FLOW (mgd) |
BOD5 |
NH3-N1 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
FLOW (mgd) |
BOD5 |
NH3-N1 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
||||||
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
||||||
City of Richmond STP3 |
45.00 |
3002 |
8.0 |
- |
- |
- |
45.00 |
5367 |
14.3 |
(lbs/d) |
- |
- |
|
E.I. DuPont-Spruance |
8.68 |
936 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8.68 |
936 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Falling Creek STP |
9.00 |
1202 |
16.0 |
- |
- |
5.9 |
9.00 |
2253 |
30.0 |
- |
- |
5.9 |
|
Proctor's Creek STP |
6.40 |
1601 |
30.0 |
- |
- |
5.9 |
11.80 |
2952 |
30.0 |
- |
- |
5.9 |
|
Reynolds Metals Company |
0.39 |
138 |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
0.39 |
138 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Henrico STP |
30.00 |
3005 |
12.0 |
- |
- |
5.9 |
30.00 |
7260 |
29.0 |
7 |
- |
5.9 |
|
American Tobacco Company |
1.94 |
715 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.94 |
716 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
ICI Americas, Inc. |
0.20 |
152 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.20 |
152 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Phillip Morris-Park 500 |
1.50 |
559 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.50 |
557 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Allied (Chesterfield) |
51.00 |
1207 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
51.00 |
1207 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Allied (Hopewell) |
150.00 |
2500 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
150.00 |
2500 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Hopewell Regional WTF |
34.08 |
12507 |
44.0 |
- |
- |
4.8 |
34.08 |
12507 |
44.0 |
- |
- |
4.8 |
|
Petersburg STP |
15.00 |
2804 |
22.4 |
- |
- |
5.0 |
15.00 |
2804 |
22.4 |
- |
- |
5.0 |
|
TOTAL |
353.19 |
30328 |
358.59 |
39349 |
- |
||||||||
Notes: 2Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. 3Richmond STP's BOD5 is permitted as CBOD5 |
TABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS FOR THE YEAR 1990 |
||||||||||||
SUMMER (June-October) |
WINTER (November-May) |
|||||||||||
FLOW (mgd) |
CBOD5 |
NH3-N1,3 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
CBOD5 |
NH3-N1 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
||||||
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
|||||
City of Richmond STP |
45.00 |
3002 |
8.0 |
2403 |
6.4 |
5.6 |
5367 |
14.3 |
5707 |
15.2 |
5.6 |
|
E.I. DuPont-Spruance |
11.05 |
948 |
590 |
4.4 |
948 |
756 |
2.9 |
|||||
Falling Creek STP |
10.10 |
1348 |
16.0 |
539 |
6.4 |
5.9 |
2023 |
24.0 |
1281 |
15.2 |
5.9 |
|
Proctor's Creek STP |
12.00 |
1602 |
16.0 |
961 |
9.6 |
5.9 |
2403 |
24.0 |
1402 |
14.0 |
5.9 |
|
Reynolds Metals Co. |
0.49 |
172 |
8 |
6.5 |
172 |
8 |
6.5 |
|||||
Henrico STP |
30.00 |
3002 |
12.0 |
2403 |
9.6 |
5.6 |
4756 |
19.0 |
3504 |
44.0 |
5.6 |
|
American Tobacco Co. |
2.70 |
715 |
113 |
5.8 |
715 |
113 |
5.8 |
|||||
ICI Americas, Inc. |
0.20 |
167 |
8 |
5.8 |
167 |
8 |
3.1 |
|||||
Phillip Morris-Park 500 |
2.20 |
819 |
92 |
4.6 |
819 |
92 |
4.6 |
|||||
Allied (Chesterfield) |
53.00 |
1255 |
442 |
5.7 |
1255 |
442 |
5.7 |
|||||
Allied (Hopewell) |
165.00 |
2750 |
10326 |
6.1 |
2750 |
10326 |
6.1 |
|||||
Hopewell Regional WTF |
34.07 |
12502 |
44.0 |
12091 |
36.2 |
4.8 |
12502 |
44.0 |
10291 |
36.2 |
4.8 |
|
Petersburg STP |
15.00 |
2802 |
22.4 |
801 |
6.4 |
5.0 |
2802 |
22.4 |
2028 |
16.2 |
5.0 |
|
TOTAL |
380.81 |
31084 |
28978 |
36679 |
35958 |
|||||||
Notes: 2Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. 3Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit. |
TABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2000 |
||||||||||||
SUMMER (June-October) |
WINTER (November-May) |
|||||||||||
FLOW (mgd) |
CBOD5 |
NH3-N1,3 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
CBOD5 |
NH3-N1 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
||||||
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
|||||
City of Richmond STP |
45.08 |
3002 |
8.0 |
2403 |
6.4 |
5.6 |
5367 |
14.3 |
5707 |
15.2 |
5.6 |
|
E.I. DuPont-Spruance |
196.99 |
948 |
590 |
4.4 |
948 |
756 |
2.9 |
|||||
Falling Creek STP |
10.10 |
1348 |
16.0 |
539 |
6.4 |
5.9 |
2023 |
24.0 |
1281 |
15.2 |
5.9 |
|
Proctor's Creek STP |
16.80 |
1602 |
11.4 |
961 |
6.9 |
5.9 |
2403 |
17.1 |
1402 |
10.0 |
5.9 |
|
Reynolds Metals Co. |
0.78 |
172 |
13 |
6.5 |
172 |
13 |
6.5 |
|||||
Henrico STP |
32.80 |
3002 |
11.0 |
2403 |
8.8 |
5.6 |
4756 |
17.4 |
3504 |
12.8 |
5.6 |
|
American Tobacco Co. |
3.00 |
715 |
113 |
5.8 |
715 |
113 |
5.8 |
|||||
ICI Americas, Inc. |
0.20 |
167 |
8 |
5.8 |
167 |
8 |
3.1 |
|||||
Phillip Morris-Park 500 |
2.90 |
819 |
92 |
4.6 |
819 |
92 |
4.6 |
|||||
Allied (Chesterfield) |
56.00 |
1255 |
442 |
5.7 |
1255 |
442 |
5.7 |
|||||
Allied (Hopewell) |
170.00 |
2750 |
10326 |
6.1 |
2750 |
10326 |
6.1 |
|||||
Hopewell Regional WTF |
36.78 |
12502 |
40.7 |
12091 |
33.5 |
4.8 |
12502 |
40.7 |
10291 |
33.5 |
4.8 |
|
Petersburg STP |
15.00 |
2802 |
22.4 |
801 |
6.4 |
5.0 |
2802 |
22.4 |
2028 |
16.2 |
5.0 |
|
TOTAL |
406.43 |
31084 |
28982 |
36679 |
35963 |
|||||||
Notes: 2Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. 3Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit. |
TABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS FOR THE YEAR 2010 |
||||||||||||
SUMMER (June-October) |
WINTER (November-May) |
|||||||||||
FLOW (mgd) |
CBOD5 |
NH3-N1,3 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
CBOD5 |
NH3-N1 |
DO2 (mg/l) |
||||||
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
(lbs/d) |
(mg/l) |
|||||
City of Richmond STP |
45.86 |
3002 |
7.8 |
2403 |
6.3 |
5.6 |
5367 |
14.0 |
5707 |
14.9 |
5.6 |
|
E.I. DuPont-Spruance |
16.99 |
948 |
590 |
4.4 |
948 |
756 |
2.9 |
|||||
Falling Creek STP |
10.10 |
1348 |
16.0 |
539 |
6.4 |
5.9 |
2023 |
24.0 |
1281 |
15.2 |
5.9 |
|
Proctor's Creek STP |
24.00 |
1602 |
8.0 |
961 |
4.8 |
5.9 |
2403 |
12.0 |
1402 |
7.0 |
5.9 |
|
Reynolds Metals Co. |
0.78 |
172 |
13 |
6.5 |
172 |
13 |
6.5 |
|||||
Henrico STP |
38.07 |
3002 |
9.5 |
2403 |
7.6 |
5.6 |
4756 |
15.0 |
3504 |
11.0 |
5.6 |
|
American Tobacco Co. |
3.00 |
715 |
113 |
5.8 |
715 |
113 |
5.8 |
|||||
ICI Americas, Inc. |
0.20 |
167 |
8 |
5.8 |
167 |
8 |
3.1 |
|||||
Phillip Morris-Park 500 |
2.90 |
819 |
92 |
4.6 |
819 |
92 |
4.6 |
|||||
Allied (Chesterfield) |
56.00 |
1255 |
442 |
5.7 |
1255 |
442 |
5.7 |
|||||
Allied (Hopewell) |
180.00 |
2750 |
10326 |
6.1 |
2750 |
10326 |
6.1 |
|||||
Hopewell Regional WTF |
39.61 |
12502 |
37.8 |
10291 |
31.1 |
4.8 |
12502 |
37.8 |
10291 |
31.1 |
4.8 |
|
Petersburg STP |
15.00 |
2802 |
22.4 |
801 |
6.4 |
5.0 |
2802 |
22.4 |
2028 |
16.2 |
5.0 |
|
TOTAL |
432.1 |
31084 |
28982 |
36679 |
35963 |
|||||||
Notes: 2Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. 3Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit. |
C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers.
The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.
Virginia Waterbody ID |
Discharger Name |
VPDES Permit No. |
Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
I37R |
Buena Vista STP |
VA0020991 |
41,115 |
|
I09R |
Covington STP |
VA0025542 |
54,820 |
|
H02R |
Georgia Pacific |
VA0003026 |
122,489 |
|
I37R |
|
VA0004677 |
30,456 |
|
I35R |
Lexington-Rockbridge WQCF |
VA0088161 |
54,820 |
|
I09R |
Low Moor STP |
VA0027979 |
9,137 |
|
I09R |
Lower Jackson River STP |
VA0090671 |
|
|
I09R |
Nutrient Offset Fund |
Formerly VA0090671 |
16,441 |
1,112 |
I04R |
|
VA0003646 |
394,400 |
|
H12R |
Amherst STP |
VA0031321 |
10,964 |
|
H05R |
BWX Technologies Inc. |
VA0003697 |
187,000 |
|
H05R |
Greif Inc. |
VA0006408 |
73,246 |
|
H31R |
Lake Monticello |
VA0024945 |
|
|
H31R |
Nutrient Offset Fund |
Formerly VA0024945 |
4,018 |
272 |
H05R |
Lynchburg STP1 |
VA0024970 |
536,0195 |
|
H28R |
Moores Creek |
VA0025518 |
|
|
H38R |
Powhatan CC STP |
VA0020699 |
8,588 |
|
J11R |
Crewe WWTP |
VA0020303 |
9,137 |
|
J01R |
Farmville WWTP |
VA0083135 |
43,856 |
|
G02E |
|
Formerly VA0002780 |
25,583 |
|
G01E |
E I du Pont - Spruance |
VA0004669 |
201,080 |
|
G01E |
Falling Creek WWTP |
VA0024996 |
|
|
G01E |
Henrico County WWTP |
VA0063690 |
1,142,085 3 |
|
G03E |
|
VA0005291 |
1,090,798 |
|
G03R |
Hopewell WWTP |
VA0066630 |
1,827,336 7 |
|
G15E |
HRSD – Boat Harbor STP |
VA0081256 |
|
|
G11E |
HRSD – James River STP |
VA0081272 |
|
|
G10E |
HRSD – Williamsburg STP |
VA0081302 |
|
|
G02E |
Philip Morris – Park 500 |
VA0026557 |
139,724 |
|
G01E |
Proctors Creek WWTP |
VA0060194 |
411,151 3 |
|
G01E |
Richmond WWTP1 |
VA0063177 |
1,096,402 5 |
|
G02E |
Dominion-Chesterfield2 |
VA0004146 |
|
|
J15R |
South Central WW Authority |
VA0025437 |
350,239 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
G05R |
Tyson Foods – Glen Allen |
VA0004031 |
19,552 |
409 |
G11E |
HRSD – Nansemond STP |
VA0081299 |
|
|
G15E |
HRSD – Army Base STP |
VA0081230 |
|
|
G15E |
HRSD – VIP WWTP |
VA0081281 |
|
|
G15E |
|
|
153,500 |
|
C07E |
HRSD – Ches.-Elizabeth STP 10 |
VA0081264 |
|
|
G01E |
|
Formerly Tranlin/Vastly |
80,000 |
0 |
TOTALS |
|
|
||
Notes:
1Wasteload allocations for localities served by combined sewers are based on dry weather design flow capacity. During wet weather flow events the discharge shall achieve a TN concentration of 8.0 mg/l and a TP concentration of 1.0 mg/l.
2Wasteload allocations are "net" loads, based on the portion of the nutrient discharge introduced by the facility's process waste streams, and not originating in raw water intake. Dominion-Chesterfield wasteload allocations shall be transferred to the Nutrient Offset Fund on January 1, following the retirement of the last coal fired generating unit. 82,240 lbs/yr of TN WLA shall be held in reserve and may be made available by the department for an expansion of the Proctor's Creek WWTP provided that the expanded facility provides treatment to achieve an annual average TN concentration of 3.0 mg/l or less and the Falling Creek WWTP is designed to meet its individual TN WLA.
3Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
4Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
5Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 8.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
6The Moores Creek Advanced WRRF WLA includes 8,894 lbs/yr of total nitrogen and 1,112 lbs/yr of total phosphorus from the consolidation of the Camelot WWTP (VA0025488).
7Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the value listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 12.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
8Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the value listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.50 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
9The former J. H. Miles wasteload allocations acquired by HRSD in accordance with an agreement dated December 21, 2015 may be used to fulfill HRSD commitments to provide nutrient credits to municipal separate storm sewer systems only.
10Effective January 1, 2023, the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the HRSD Chesapeake-Elizabeth STP transfer to the Nutrient Offset Fund.
A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).
TMDL # |
Stream Name |
TMDL Title |
City/County |
WBID |
Pollutant |
WLA1 |
Units |
1. |
Broad Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Broad and Jackson Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
2. |
Central Branch Carter Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Carter Creek |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
3. |
Eastern Branch Carter Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Carter Creek |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
4. |
Western Branch Carter Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Carter Creek |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
5. |
Carter Run |
Bacteria TMDL for Carter Run |
Fauquier |
E02 |
E. coli |
1.12E+12 |
cfu/year |
6. |
Bells Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
7. |
Eastern Branch Corrotoman River |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
8. |
Ewells Prong |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
9. |
Hills Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
10. |
Millenbeck Prong |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
11. |
Myer Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
12. |
Senior Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
13. |
Taylor Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
14. |
Western Branch Corrotoman River |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River |
Lancaster |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
15. |
Deep Run |
Bacteria TMDL for Deep Run |
Fauquier |
E10 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
16. |
Farnham Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Farnham Creek |
Richmond |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
17. |
Great Run |
Bacteria TMDL for Great Run |
Fauquier |
E02 |
E. coli |
4.35E+12 |
cfu/year |
18. |
Greenvale Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Towles Point to Deep Creek |
Lancaster |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
19. |
Rappahannock River, Beach Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Towles Point to Deep Creek |
Lancaster |
E25, E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
20. |
Hoskins Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Hoskins Creek Watershed |
Essex |
E23 |
Enterococci |
7.56E+09 |
cfu/day |
21. |
Lagrange Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lagrange and Robinson Creeks |
Middlesex |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
22. |
Robinson Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lagrange and Robinson Creeks |
Middlesex |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
23. |
Deep Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lancaster, Deep, and Mulberry Creeks |
Lancaster |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
24. |
Lancaster Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lancaster, Deep, and Mulberry Creeks |
Lancaster, Richmond |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
25. |
Mulberry Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lancaster, Deep, and Mulberry Creeks |
Lancaster |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
26. |
Locklies Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Locklies and Mill Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
27. |
Mill Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Locklies and Mill Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
28. |
Mountain Run |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Mountain Run Watershed |
Culpeper |
E09 |
Fecal coliform |
1.36E+13 |
cfu/year |
29. |
Mine Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Mountain Run and Mine Run |
Orange |
E17 |
E. coli |
1.25E+11 |
cfu/year |
30. |
Mountain Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for Mountain Run and Mine Run |
Orange |
E17 |
E. coli |
2.26E+11 |
cfu/year |
31. |
Muddy Run, lower |
Bacteria TMDL for Muddy Run |
Culpeper |
E07 |
E. coli |
2.09E+10 |
cfu/year |
32. |
Muddy Run, upper |
Bacteria TMDL for Muddy Run |
Culpeper |
E07 |
E. coli |
0 |
cfu/year |
33. |
Farmers Hall Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for Occupacia Creek and Farmers Hall Creek |
Essex |
E22 |
E. coli |
7.58E+08 |
cfu/day |
34. |
Occupacia Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for Occupacia Creek and Farmers Hall Creek |
Essex |
E22 |
E. coli |
6.27E+09 |
cfu/day |
35. |
Mosquito Creek |
Oyster and Mosquito Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Lancaster |
E26, C01 |
Fecal coliform |
9.32E+08 |
MPN/day |
36. |
Oyster Creek |
Oyster and Mosquito Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination |
Lancaster |
E26, C01 |
Fecal coliform |
1.36E+09 |
MPN/day |
37. |
Unnamed tributary to the Rapidan River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin |
Orange |
E13 |
E. coli |
6.99E+09 |
cfu/year |
38. |
Marsh Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin |
Orange |
E13 |
E. coli |
6.72E+10 |
cfu/year |
39. |
Blue Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin |
Orange |
E13 |
E. coli |
8.75E+10 |
cfu/year |
40. |
Cedar Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin |
Culpeper |
E16 |
E. coli |
1.82E+12 |
cfu/year |
41. |
Rapidan River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin |
Orange, Culpeper, Greene, Madison |
E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E18 |
E. coli |
1.98E+13 |
cfu/year |
42. |
Rapidan River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin |
Madison, Greene, Orange |
E11, E12, E13 |
E. coli |
3.26E+13 |
cfu/year |
43. |
Parrotts Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Mud and Parrotts Creeks |
Middlesex |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
44. |
Weeks (Mud) Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Mud and Parrotts Creeks |
Middlesex |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
45. |
Robinson River, upper |
Bacteria TMDL for Robinson River |
Madison |
E14 |
E. coli |
5.07E+09 |
cfu/year |
46. |
Robinson River, lower |
Bacteria TMDL for Robinson River |
Madison |
E14, E15 |
E. coli |
5.03E+10 |
cfu/year |
47. |
Little Dark Run |
Bacteria TMDL for Robinson River |
Madison |
E15 |
E. coli |
1.39E+11 |
cfu/year |
48. |
Rappahannock River, Bush Park Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Bush Park and Sturgeon Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
49. |
Rappahannock River, Sturgeon Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Bush Park and Sturgeon Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
50. |
Thumb Run |
Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Thumb Run |
Fauquier |
E01 |
Fecal coliform |
0 |
cfu/year |
51. |
Rappahannock River, tidal fresh |
Bacteria TMDL for the Tidal Freshwater Rappahannock River Watershed |
Caroline, King George, Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, Stafford |
E19, E20, E21 |
E. coli |
1.14E+14 |
cfu/year |
52. |
Totuskey Creek |
Totuskey and Richardson Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Richmond |
E24 |
Enterococci |
6.40E+08 |
cfu/day |
53. |
Totuskey Creek, Richardson Creek, Rappahannock River |
Totuskey and Richardson Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution |
Richmond |
E24 |
Fecal coliform |
2.29E+09 |
MPN/day |
54. |
Hughes River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Madison |
E03 |
E. coli |
8.44E+09 |
cfu/year |
55. |
Craig Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Fauquier |
E08 |
E. coli |
2.72E+10 |
cfu/year |
56. |
Browns Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Fauquier |
E08 |
E. coli |
3.38E+10 |
cfu/year |
57. |
Rappahannock River (1) - VAN-E01R-03 |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Rappahannock |
E01 |
E. coli |
1.79E+11 |
cfu/year |
58. |
Rush River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Rappahannock |
E05 |
E. coli |
5.22E+11 |
cfu/year |
59. |
Hazel River (2) - 60076 |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock |
E03, E04, E05, E06, E07 |
E. coli |
7.48E+11 |
cfu/year |
60. |
Marsh Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Fauquier |
E08 |
E. coli |
8.76E+11 |
cfu/year |
61. |
Hazel River (1) - VAN-E04R-01 |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock |
E03, E04 |
E. coli |
3.92E+12 |
cfu/year |
62. |
Rappahannock River (2) - VAN-E08R-04 |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock, Fauquier |
E01, E02, E03, E04, E05, E06, E07, E08 |
E. coli |
1.85E+13 |
cfu/year |
63. |
Rappahannock River (3) - 60081 |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin |
Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock, Fauquier |
E01, E02, E03, E04, E05, E06, E07, E08 |
E. coli |
2.18E+13 |
cfu/year |
64. |
Rappahannock River, Mark Haven Beach |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina |
Essex |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
6.72E+08 |
counts/day |
65. |
Rappahannock River, Garrett's Marina |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina |
Essex |
E24 |
Fecal coliform |
1.94E+09 |
counts/day |
66. |
Upper Rappahannock River |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina |
Westmoreland, Essex, Richmond |
E22, E23, E24 |
Fecal coliform |
7.08E+10 |
counts/day |
67. |
Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina |
Richmond |
E23 |
Fecal coliform |
1.01E+10 |
counts/day |
68. |
Piscataway Creek |
Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina |
Essex |
E23 |
Fecal coliform |
4.92E+10 |
counts/day |
69. |
Urbanna Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Urbanna Creek |
Middlesex |
E25 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
70. |
Meachim Creek (179A) |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Whiting and Meachim Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
71. |
Meachim Creek (179B) |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Whiting and Meachim Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
72. |
Rappahannock River: Whiting Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Whiting and Meachim Creeks |
Middlesex |
E26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
73. |
Mill Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Caroline |
E21R |
E. coli |
1.19E+12 |
cfu/year |
74. |
Jetts Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
King George |
E21R |
E. coli |
6.41E+10 |
cfu/year |
75. |
Portobago Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Caroline |
E21R |
E. coli |
1.06E+11 |
cfu/year |
76. |
Stillwater Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Essex |
E22R |
E. coli |
3.50E+10 |
cfu/year |
77. |
Baylors Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Essex |
E22R |
E. coli |
4.72E+10 |
cfu/year |
78. |
Elmwood Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Essex |
E22R |
E. coli |
5.14E+10 |
cfu/year |
79. |
Peedee Creek, non-tidal |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Westmoreland |
E22R |
E. coli |
2.62E+10 |
cfu/year |
80. |
Unnamed tributary of Peedee Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Westmoreland |
E22R |
E. coli |
1.30E+9 |
cfu/year |
81. |
Peedee Creek, tidal |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Westmoreland |
E22E |
Enterococci |
2.07E+10 |
cfu/day |
82. |
Rappahannock River, tidal |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia |
Richmond County, Essex |
E22E |
Enterococci |
3.11E+12 |
cfu/day |
Notes: 2There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area. |
B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.
9VAC25-720-70 Rappahannock Area Development Commission (RADCO) 208 Area Wide Waste Treatment Management Plan and Potomac-Shenandoah River Basin 303(e) Water Quality Management Plan is included in The Potomac River Basin section.
C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers.
The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.
Virginia Waterbody ID |
Discharger Name |
VPDES Permit No. |
Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
E09R |
Culpeper WWTP |
VA0061590 |
73,093 1 |
5,483 2 |
E02R |
Marshall WWTP |
VA0031763 |
7,797 |
585 |
E13R |
Orange STP |
VA0021385 |
36,547 |
2,741 |
E11R |
Rapidan |
VA0090948 |
7,309 |
548 |
E02R |
|
VA0076805 |
24,364 |
1,827 |
E02R |
Clevengers Village WWTP |
VA0080527 |
10,964 |
822 |
E02R |
Warrenton Town STP |
VA0021172 |
30,456 |
2,284 |
E18R |
Wilderness WWTP |
VA0083411 |
15,228 |
1,142 |
E20E |
FMC WWTF |
VA0068110 |
48,737 1 |
3,655 2 |
E20E |
Fredericksburg WWTF |
VA0025127 |
54,820 1 |
4,112 2 |
E21E |
Haymount WWTF |
VA0089125 |
7,066 |
530 |
E24E |
Haynesville CC WWTP |
VA0023469 |
2,802 |
210 |
E21E |
KGCSA - Hopyard |
VA0089338 |
6,091 |
457 |
E20E |
Little Falls Run WWTF |
VA0076392 |
97,458 1 |
7,309 2 |
E20E |
Massaponax WWTF |
VA0025658 |
114,505 1 |
8,405 2 |
E23R |
Montross Westmoreland WWTP |
VA0072729 |
1,584 |
119 |
E21E |
KGCSA - Oakland Park STP |
VA0086789 |
1,706 |
128 |
E23E |
Tappahannock WWTP |
VA0071471 |
9,746 |
731 |
E26E |
HRSD - Urbanna |
VA0026263 |
1,218 |
91 |
E21R |
US Army - Ft. A P Hill WWTP |
VA0032034 |
6,457 |
484 |
E23E |
Warsaw |
VA0026891 |
3,655 |
274 |
C01E |
Omega Protein - Reedville |
VA0003867 |
21,213 |
1,591 |
C01E |
Reedville Sanitary District |
VA0060712 |
2,436 |
183 |
C01E |
Kilmarnock |
VA0020788 |
6,091 |
457 |
|
22,904 |
1,900 |
||
TOTALS: |
|
46,068 |
||
1Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. 2Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. |
A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).
TMDL # |
Stream Name |
TMDL Title |
City/County |
WBID |
Pollutant |
WLA1 |
Units |
1. |
Lower Pamunkey River |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent |
F13R, F13E, F14R, F14E |
E. coli |
5.38E+13 |
cfu/yr |
2. |
Middle Pamunkey River |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent |
F12R |
E. coli |
2.36E+13 |
cfu/yr |
3. |
Taylors Creek (VAN-F03R-01) |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent |
F03R |
E. coli |
3.66E+10 |
cfu/yr |
4. |
Northeast Creek |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent |
F09R |
E. coli |
2.34E+12 |
cfu/yr |
5. |
Totopotomoy Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Pamunkey River Basin |
Hanover |
F13 |
E. coli |
2.62E+10 |
cfu/year |
6. |
Newfound River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Pamunkey River Basin |
Hanover |
F05 |
E. coli |
2.89E+10 |
cfu/year |
7. |
South Anna River (VAN-F02R-01) |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent |
F01R, F02R |
E. coli |
7.50E+12 |
cfu/yr |
8. |
South Anna River (VAN-F01R-01) |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent |
F01R |
E. coli |
4.92E+12 |
cfu/yr |
9. |
South Anna River (VAP-F04R-01) |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent |
F03R, F04R |
E. coli |
7.74E+12 |
cfu/yr |
10. |
South Anna River (VAP-F04R-02) |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent |
F04R |
E. coli |
6.02E+12 |
cfu/yr |
11. |
Adams Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Poropotank River and Adams Creek |
Gloucester |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
4.48E+08 |
MPN/day |
12. |
Poropotank River and Morris Bay |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Poropotank River and Adams Creek |
Gloucester |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
4.78E+09 |
MPN/day |
13. |
Felgates Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds |
York |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
3.70E+10 |
MPN/day |
14. |
King Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds |
York |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
4.37E+10 |
MPN/day |
15. |
Queen Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds |
York, Williamsburg |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
9.69E+11 |
MPN/day |
16. |
Perrin River, upper |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Sarah Creek and Perrin River |
Gloucester |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
17. |
Sarah Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Sarah Creek and Perrin River |
Gloucester |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
18. |
Plentiful Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin |
Spotsylvania |
F07 |
E. coli |
3.57E+09 |
cfu/year |
19. |
Mountain Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin |
Orange |
F06 |
E. coli |
1.22E+10 |
cfu/year |
20. |
Beaver Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin |
Orange |
F06 |
E. coli |
1.25E+10 |
cfu/year |
21. |
Terrys Run |
Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin |
Orange |
F07 |
E. coli |
1.86E+10 |
cfu/year |
22. |
Pamunkey Creek and Tomahawk Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin |
Orange |
F07 |
E. coli |
9.05E+10 |
cfu/year |
23. |
Goldmine Creek |
Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin |
Louisa |
F06 |
E. coli |
1.09E+11 |
cfu/year |
24. |
Lower Pamunkey River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds |
New Kent, King William |
F14 |
Enterococci |
1.34E+10 |
cfu/day |
25. |
Lower Mattaponi River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds |
King and Queen, King William |
F24, F25 |
Enterococci |
1.42E+10 |
cfu/day |
26. |
Upper York River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds |
New Kent, King William, King and Queen |
F14, F24, F25, F26 |
Enterococci |
2.76E+10 |
cfu/day |
27. |
Upper York River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds |
New Kent, King William, King and Queen |
F14, F24, F25, F26 |
Fecal coliform |
1.14E+12 |
counts/day |
28. |
Taskinas Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments |
James City |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
4.97E+08 |
MPN/day |
29. |
Skimino Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments |
James City |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
1.34E+09 |
MPN/day |
30. |
Ware Creek |
TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments |
James City |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
1.36E+09 |
MPN/day |
31. |
Aberdeen Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek |
Gloucester |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
32. |
Carter Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek |
Gloucester |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
33. |
Cedarbush Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek |
Gloucester |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
34. |
Jones Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek |
Gloucester |
F26 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
35. |
Timberneck Creek |
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek |
Gloucester |
F27 |
Fecal coliform |
N/A2 |
MPN/day |
36. |
Upper Little River |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent |
F11R, F10R |
E. coli |
5.61E+12 |
cfu/yr |
37. |
Upper Pamunkey River and North Anna River |
E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA |
Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent |
F12R, F09R |
E. coli |
3.25E+13 |
cfu/yr |
38. |
Brock Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Spotsylvania |
F15 |
E. coli |
3.09E+10 |
cfu/yr |
39. |
Chapel Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
King and Queen |
F21 |
E. coli |
1.25E+12 |
cfu/yr |
40. |
Doctors Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline |
F22 |
E. coli |
3.24E+11 |
cfu/yr |
41. |
Glady Run |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Spotsylvania |
F16 |
E. coli |
1.85E+11 |
cfu/yr |
42. |
Maracossic Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline, King and Queen |
F22 |
E. coli |
5.24E+12 |
cfu/yr |
43. |
Mat River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Spotsylvania |
F18 |
E. coli |
1.94E+11 |
cfu/yr |
44. |
Matta River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Spotsylvania, Caroline |
F18 |
E. coli |
2.14E+12 |
cfu/yr |
45. |
Mattaponi River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline |
F17 |
E. coli |
6.16E+12 |
cfu/yr |
46. |
Motto River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline |
F19 |
E. coli |
6.48E+10 |
cfu/yr |
47. |
Po River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Spotsylvania, Caroline |
F16 |
E. coli |
1.46E+12 |
cfu/yr |
48. |
Polecat Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline |
F20 |
E. coli |
1.56E+11 |
cfu/yr |
49. |
Poni River |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline |
F17 |
E. coli |
2.93E+12 |
cfu/yr |
50. |
Reedy Creek |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
Caroline |
F21 |
E. coli |
2.08E+11 |
cfu/yr |
51. |
Root Swamp |
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed |
King and Queen |
F22 |
E. coli |
5.15E+11 |
cfu/yr |
Notes: 2There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area. |
B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.
TABLE B1 -- RECOMMENDED STREAM SEGMENTS IN THE YORK RIVER BASIN |
||
Segment Number |
Classification |
Name of River (Description)* |
8–1 |
E.L. |
North Anna River (main and tributaries except Goldmine Creek and Contrary Creek) R.M. 68.4–0.0 |
8–2 |
E.L. |
Goldmine Creek |
8–3 |
W.Q. |
Contrary Creek (main only) R.M. 9.5–0.0 |
8–4 |
E.L. |
South Anna River (main and tributaries) R.M. 101.2–97.1 |
8–5 |
E.L. |
South Anna River (main only) R.M. 97.1–77.4 |
8–6 |
E.L. |
South Anna River (main and tributaries) R.M.77.4–0.0 |
8–7 |
E.L. |
Pamunkey River (main and tributaries) R.M. 90.7–12.2 |
8–8 |
W.Q. |
Pamunkey River (main only) R.M. 12.2–0.0 |
8–9 |
E.L. |
Mattaponi River (main and tributaries) R.M.102.2–10.2 |
8–10 |
E.L. |
Mattaponi River (main only) R.M.10.2–0.0 |
8–11 |
W.Q. |
York River (main only) R.M. 30.4–22.4 |
8–12 |
E.L. |
York River (main and tributaries except King Creek and Carter Creek) R.M. 22.4–0.0 |
8–13 |
E.L. |
Carter Creek (main and tributaries) R.M. 5.4–2.0 |
8–14 |
E.L. |
Carter Creek (main only) R.M. 2.0–0.0 |
8–15 |
E.L. |
King Creek (main only) R.M. 5.6–0.0 |
8–16 |
W.Q. |
Condemned shellfish areas- Timberneck, Queens, and Sarah Creeks and portions of the main stream of the York River. |
Notes: Source: Roy F. Western |
TABLE B2 -- WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS (IN LBS PER DAY) |
|||||||||||
POINT SOURCE |
1977 WASTELOAD2 |
MAXIMUM7 DAILY LOAD |
RECOMMENDED ALLOCATION |
RAW WASTELOAD AT 1995 |
REQUIRED & REMOVAL EFFICIENCY 1995 |
||||||
CBOD5 |
UBOD1 |
CBOD5 |
UBOD |
CBOD5 |
UBOD |
PERCENT |
CBOD5 |
UBOD |
CBOD5 |
UBOD |
|
Gordonsville |
145 |
398 |
150 |
412 |
150 |
412 |
0 |
1950 |
2730 |
92 |
85 |
Louisa-Mineral |
50 |
108 |
55 |
118 |
55 |
118 |
0 |
850 |
1150 |
93 |
90 |
Doswell |
52 |
110 |
8628 |
14078 |
6908 |
11258 |
20 |
1080 |
1444 |
854 |
71 |
Thornburg |
63 |
150 |
68 |
162 |
68 |
162 |
0 |
1240 |
1690 |
94 |
90 |
Bowling Green |
27 |
64 |
29 |
68 |
29 |
68 |
0 |
680 |
926 |
96 |
93 |
Ashland |
160 |
303 |
235 |
559 |
188 |
447 |
20 |
2250 |
3825 |
92 |
88 |
Hanover (Regional STP) |
170 |
437 |
280 |
820 |
280 |
820 |
0 |
5730 |
7930 |
96 |
90 |
Chesapeake Corp. |
6400 |
8000 |
104455 |
150005 |
104455 |
150005 |
N/A |
51700 |
64630 |
90 |
90 |
West Point |
105 |
380 |
2813 |
1020 |
225 |
814 |
20 |
1000 |
1600 |
854 |
66 |
Notes: 2Projected for 1977 based on population projections. 3Recommended allocation based on BPCTCA effluent guidelines applied to raw wasteloads at 2020. 4Minimum removal efficiency. 5Allocation based on BPCTCA effluent guidelines; amended by Minute 25, June 3-5, 1979 board meeting. 7Assimilative capacity. 8Amended by Minute 1, August 17, 1978, board meeting. Source: Roy F. Weston, Inc. |
C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers. The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.
Virginia Waterbody ID |
Discharger Name |
VPDES Permit No. |
Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr) |
F20R |
Caroline County |
VA0073504 |
9,137 |
609 |
F01R |
Gordonsville STP |
VA0021105 |
17,177 |
1,145 |
F04R |
Ashland WWTP |
VA0024899 |
36,547 |
2,436 |
F09R |
Doswell WWTP |
VA0029521 |
18,273 |
1,218 |
F09R |
|
VA0029521 |
47,328 |
10,233 |
F27E |
|
Formerly VA0003018 |
167,128 |
17,689 |
F27E |
HRSD - York River STP |
VA0081311 |
275,927 1 |
18,395 2 |
F14R |
Parham Landing WWTP |
VA0088331 |
36,547 |
2,436 |
F14E |
|
VA0003115 |
259,177 |
56,038 |
F12E |
Totopotomoy WWTP |
VA0089915 |
182,734 1 |
12,182 2 |
F25E |
HRSD - West Point STP |
VA0075434 |
10,964 |
731 |
TOTALS: |
1,060,939 |
123,112 |
||
1Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
2Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:
TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365
Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision.
A. By July 1, 2017 2022, every owner of a facility subject to reduced individual total nitrogen or total phosphorous wasteload allocations as identified in 9VAC25-820-80 and subject to a limit effective date after January 1, 2017, as defined in Part I C 1 of 9VAC25-820-70 shall either individually or through the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association submit compliance plans to the department for approval.
1. The compliance plans shall contain any capital projects and implementation schedules needed to achieve total nitrogen and phosphorus reductions sufficient to comply with the individual and combined wasteload allocations of all the permittees in the tributary as soon as possible. Permittees submitting individual plans are not required to account for other facilities' activities.
2. As part of the compliance plan development, permittees shall either:
a. Demonstrate that the additional capital projects anticipated by subdivision 1 of this subsection are necessary to ensure continued compliance with these allocations by the applicable deadline for the tributary to which the facility discharges (Part I C of the permit) January 1, 2026, or
b. Request that their individual wasteload allocations become effective on January 1, 2017 2022.
3. The compliance plans may rely on the exchange of point source credits in accordance with this general permit, but not the acquisition of credits through payments into the Nutrient Offset Fund (§ 10.1-2128.2 of the Code of Virginia), to achieve compliance with the individual and combined wasteload allocations in each tributary.
B. Every owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement shall either individually or through the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association submit annual compliance plan updates to the department for approval as required by Part I D of the general permit.
Any owner whose registration statement is accepted by the board will receive the following general permit and shall comply with the requirements of the general permit.
General Permit No.: VAN000000
Effective Date: January 1, 2017 2022
Expiration Date: December 31, 2021 2026
GENERAL PERMIT FOR TOTAL NITROGEN AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DISCHARGES AND NUTRIENT TRADING IN THE CHESAPEAKE WATERSHED IN VIRGINIA
AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW
In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and pursuant to the State Water Control Law and regulations adopted pursuant to it, owners of facilities holding a VPDES individual permit or owners of facilities that otherwise meet the definition of an existing facility, with total nitrogen or total phosphorus discharges, or both to the Chesapeake Bay or its tributaries, are authorized to discharge to surface waters and exchange credits for total nitrogen or total phosphorus, or both.
The authorized discharge shall be in accordance with the registration statement filed with DEQ, this cover page, Part I-Special Conditions Applicable to All Facilities, Part II-Special Conditions Applicable to New and Expanded Facilities, and Part III-Conditions Applicable to All VPDES Permits, as set forth herein.
Part I
SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL FACILITIES
Any owner whose registration statement is accepted by the board will receive the following general permit and shall comply with the requirements of the general permit.
General Permit No.: VAN000000
Effective Date: January 1, 2017 2022
Expiration Date: December 31, 2021 2026
GENERAL PERMIT FOR TOTAL NITROGEN AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DISCHARGES AND NUTRIENT TRADING IN THE CHESAPEAKE WATERSHED IN VIRGINIA
AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW
In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and pursuant to the State Water Control Law and regulations adopted pursuant to it, owners of facilities holding a VPDES individual permit or owners of facilities that otherwise meet the definition of an existing facility, with total nitrogen or total phosphorus discharges, or both to the Chesapeake Bay or its tributaries, are authorized to discharge to surface waters and exchange credits for total nitrogen or total phosphorus, or both.
The authorized discharge shall be in accordance with the registration statement filed with DEQ, this cover page, Part I-Special Conditions Applicable to All Facilities, Part II-Special Conditions Applicable to New and Expanded Facilities, and Part III-Conditions Applicable to All VPDES Permits, as set forth herein.
Part I
SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL FACILITIES
A. Authorized activities.
1. Authorization to discharge for owners of facilities required to register.
a. Every owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement to the department by November 1, 2016 2021, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit, shall be authorized to discharge total nitrogen and total phosphorus subject to the requirements of this general permit upon the department's approval of the registration statement.
b. Any owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement with the department at the time he makes application with the department for a new discharge or expansion that is subject to an offset or technology-based requirement in Part II of this general permit, shall be authorized to discharge total nitrogen and total phosphorus subject to the requirements of this general permit upon the department's approval of the registration statement.
c. Upon the department's approval of the registration statement, a facility will be included in the registration list maintained by the department.
2. Authorization to discharge for owners of facilities not required to register. Any owner of a facility authorized by a VPDES permit and not required by this general permit to submit a registration statement shall be deemed to be authorized to discharge total nitrogen and total phosphorus under this general permit at the time it is issued. Owners of facilities that are deemed to be permitted under this subsection shall have no obligation under this general permit prior to submitting a registration statement and securing coverage under this general permit based upon such registration statement.
3. Continuation of permit coverage.
a. Any owner authorized to discharge under this general permit and who submits a complete registration statement for the reissued general permit by November 1, 2021 2026, in accordance with Part III M or who is not required to register in accordance with Part I A 2 is authorized to continue to discharge under the terms of this general permit until such time as the board either:
(1) Issues coverage to the owner under the reissued general permit, or
(2) Notifies the owner that the discharge is not eligible for coverage under this general permit.
b. When the owner that was covered under the expiring or expired general permit has violated or is violating the conditions of that permit, the board may choose to do any or all of the following:
(1) Initiate enforcement action based upon the 2012 2017 general permit,
(2) Issue a notice of intent to deny coverage under the reissued general permit. If the general permit coverage is denied, the owner would then be required to cease the discharges authorized by the administratively continued coverage under the terms of the 2012 2017 general permit or be subject to enforcement action for operating without a permit, or
(3) Take other actions authorized by the State Water Control Law.
B. Wasteload allocations.
1. Wasteload allocations allocated to permitted facilities pursuant to 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, or applicable TMDLs, or wasteload allocations acquired by owners of new and expanding facilities to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion under Part II B of this general permit, and existing loads calculated from the permitted design capacity of expanding facilities not previously covered by this general permit, shall be incorporated into the registration list maintained by the department. The wasteload allocations contained in this list shall be enforceable as annual mass load limits in this general permit. Credits shall not be generated by facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) permit that was issued before July 1, 2005.
2. Except as described in subdivisions 2 c and 2 d of this subsection, an owner of two or more facilities covered by this general permit and discharging to the same tributary may apply for and receive an aggregated mass load limit for delivered total nitrogen and an aggregated mass load limit for delivered total phosphorus reflecting the total of the water quality-based total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations or permitted design capacities established for such facilities individually.
a. The permittee (and all of the individual facilities covered under a single registration) shall be deemed to be in compliance when the aggregate mass load discharged by the facilities is less than the aggregate load limit.
b. The permittee will be eligible to generate credits only if the aggregate mass load discharged by the facilities is less than the total of the wasteload allocations assigned to any of the affected facilities.
c. The aggregation of mass load limits shall not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations.
d. Facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) permit that was issued before July 1, 2005, cannot be aggregated with other facilities under common ownership or operation.
e. Operation under an aggregated mass load limit in accordance with this section shall not be deemed credit acquisition as described in Part I J 2 of this general permit.
3. An owner that consolidates two or more facilities discharging to the same tributary into a single regional facility may apply for and receive an aggregated mass load limit for delivered total nitrogen and an aggregated mass load limit for delivered total phosphorus, subject to the following conditions:
a. Aggregate mass limits will be calculated accounting for delivery factors in effect at the time of the consolidation.
b. If all of the affected facilities have wasteload allocations in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, the aggregate mass load limit shall be calculated by adding the wasteload allocations of the affected facilities. The regional facility shall be eligible to generate credits.
b. c. If any, but not all, of the affected facilities has a wasteload allocation in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, the aggregate mass load limit shall be calculated by adding:
(1) Wasteload allocations of those facilities that have wasteload allocations in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation;
(2) Permitted design capacities assigned to affected industrial facilities; and
(3) Loads from affected sewage treatment works that do not have a wasteload allocation in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, defined as the lesser of a previously calculated permitted design capacity, or the values calculated by the following formulae:
Nitrogen Load (lbs/day) (lbs/year) = flow (MGD) x 8.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 days/year
Phosphorus Load (lbs/day) (lbs/year) = flow (MGD) x 1.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 days/year
Flows used in the preceding formulae shall be the design flow of the treatment works from which the affected facility currently discharges.
The regional facility shall be eligible to generate credits.
c. d. If none of the affected facilities have a wasteload allocation in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, the aggregate mass load limit shall be calculated by adding the respective permitted design capacities for the affected facilities.
d. e. Facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) permit that was issued before July 1, 2005, may be consolidated with other facilities under common ownership or operation, but their allocations cannot be transferred to the regional facility.
e. f. Facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a VPA permit that was issued before July 1, 2005, can become regional facilities, but they cannot receive additional allocations beyond those permitted in Part II B 1 d of this general permit.
4. Unless otherwise noted, the nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations assigned to permitted facilities are considered total loads, including nutrients present in the intake water from the river, as applicable. On a case-by-case basis, an industrial discharger may demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that a portion of the nutrient load originates in its intake water. This demonstration shall be consistent with the assumptions and methods used to derive the allocations through the Chesapeake Bay models. In these cases, the board may limit the permitted discharge to the net nutrient load portion of the assigned wasteload allocation.
5. Bioavailability. Unless otherwise noted, the entire nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations assigned to permitted facilities are considered to be bioavailable to organisms in the receiving stream. On a case-by-case basis, a discharger may demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that a portion of the nutrient load is not bioavailable; this demonstration shall not be based on the ability of the nutrient to resist degradation at the wastewater treatment plant, but instead, on the ability of the nutrient to resist degradation within a natural environment for the amount of time that it is expected to remain in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. This demonstration shall also be consistent with the assumptions and methods used to derive the allocations through the Chesapeake Bay models. In these cases, the board may limit the permitted discharge to the bioavailable portion of the assigned wasteload allocation.
C. Schedule of compliance.
1. The following schedule of compliance pertaining to the load allocations for total nitrogen and total phosphorus applies to the For facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80, compliance with chlorophyll-a based total phosphorus wasteload allocations shall be achieved as soon as possible but no later than January 1, 2026. Compliance with floating wasteload allocations shall be no later than the January 1, 2026, effective date of the allocations.
a. Compliance shall be achieved as soon as possible, but no later than the following dates, subject to any compliance plan-based adjustment by the board pursuant to subdivision 1 b of this subsection, for each upgrade phase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. 2. Following submission of compliance plans and compliance plan updates required by 9VAC25-820-40, the board shall reevaluate the schedule of compliance in subdivision 1 a of this subsection, taking into account the information in the compliance plans and the factors in § 62.1-44.19:14 C 2 of the Code of Virginia. When warranted based on such information and factors, the board shall adjust the schedule in subdivision 1 a of this subsection as appropriate by modification or reissuance of this general permit.
2. 3. The registration list shall contain individual dates for compliance with wasteload allocations for dischargers, as follows:
a. Owners of facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 will have individual dates for compliance based on their respective compliance plans that may be earlier than the upgrade phase schedule listed in subdivision 1 of this subsection.
b. Owners of facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 that waive their compliance schedules in accordance with 9VAC25-820-40 A 2 b shall have an individual compliance date of January 1, 2017 2022.
c. Upon completion of the projects contained in their compliance plans, owners of facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 may receive a revised individual compliance date of January 1 for the calendar year immediately following the year in which a Certificate to Operate was issued for the capital projects, but not later than the upgrade phase schedule listed in subdivision 1 of this subsection January 1, 2026.
d. Owners of new and expanded facilities will have individual dates for compliance corresponding to the date that coverage under this general permit was extended to discharges from the facility.
3. The significant dischargers in the James River Basin shall meet aggregate discharged wasteload allocations of 8,968,864 lbs/yr TN and 545,558 lbs/yr TP by January 1, 2023.
D. Annual update of compliance plan. Every owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement shall either individually or through the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association submit updated compliance plans to the department no later than February 1 of each year. The compliance plans shall contain sufficient information to document a plan to achieve and maintain compliance with applicable total nitrogen and total phosphorus individual wasteload allocations on the registration list and aggregate wasteload allocations in Part I C 3. Compliance plans for owners of facilities that were required to submit a registration statement with the department under Part I G 1 a may rely on the acquisition of point source credits in accordance with Part I J of this general permit, but not the acquisition of credits through payments into the Nutrient Offset Fund, to achieve compliance with the individual and combined wasteload allocations in each tributary. Annual compliance plan updates for facilities subject to reduced wasteload allocations and listed in 9VAC25-820-80 shall not rely on the acquisition of credits through payments into the Nutrient Offset Fund. Compliance plans for expansions or new discharges for owners of facilities that are required to submit a registration statement with the department under Part I G 1 b and c may rely on the acquisition of allocation in accordance with Part II B of this general permit to achieve compliance with the individual and combined wasteload allocations in each tributary.
E. Monitoring requirements.
1. Discharges shall be monitored by the permittee during weekdays as specified in the table below unless the department determines that weekday only sampling results in a non-representative load. Weekend monitoring or alternative monthly load calculations to address production schedules or seasonal flows shall be submitted to the department for review and approval on a case-by-case basis. Facilities that exhibit instantaneous discharge flows that vary from the daily average discharge flow by less than 10% may submit a proposal to the department to use an alternative sample type; such proposals shall be reviewed and approved by the department on a case-by-case basis.
Parameter |
Sample Type and Collection Frequency |
||||
STP design flow |
≥20.0 MGD |
1.0 - 19.999 MGD |
0.5 - 0.999 MGD |
0.040 - 0.499 MGD |
< 0.040 MGD |
Effluent TN load limit for industrial facilities |
≥ 100,000 |
50,000 - 99,999 lb/yr |
487 - 49,999 lb/yr |
< 487 lb/yr |
|
Effluent TP load limit for industrial facilities |
≥ 10,000 |
5,000 - 9,999 lb/yr |
37 - 4,999 lb/yr |
< 37 lb/yr |
|
Flow |
Totalizing, Indicating, and Recording |
1/Day, see individual VPDES permit for sample type |
|||
Nitrogen Compounds (Total Nitrogen = TKN + NO2- (as N) + NO3- (as N)) |
24 HC |
24 HC |
8 HC |
8 HC |
1/Month |
Total Phosphorus |
24 HC |
24 HC |
8 HC |
8 HC |
1/Month |
*Two flow composited samples taken in the same calendar week that are then composited by flow into a single weekly composite sample for analysis shall be considered to be in compliance with this requirement. |
2. Monitoring for compliance with effluent limitations shall be performed in a manner identical to that used to determine compliance with effluent limitations established in the individual VPDES permit unless specified otherwise in subdivisions 3, 4, and 5 of Part I E. Monitoring or sampling shall be conducted according to analytical laboratory methods approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test or sample collection procedures have been requested by the permittee and approved by the department in writing. All analysis for compliance with effluent limitations shall be conducted in accordance with 1VAC30-45, Certification for Noncommercial Environmental Laboratories, or 1VAC30-46, Accreditation for Commercial Environmental Laboratories. Monitoring may be performed by the permittee at frequencies more stringent than listed in subdivision 1 of Part I E; however, the permittee shall report all results of such monitoring.
3. Loading values greater than or equal to 10 pounds reported in accordance with Part I E and F of this general permit shall be calculated and reported to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. Loading values of less than 10 pounds reported in accordance with Part I E and F of this general permit shall be calculated and reported to at least two significant digits with the exception that all complete calendar year annual loads shall be reported to the nearest pound.
4. Data shall be reported on a form provided by the department, by the same date each month as is required by the owner's individual VPDES permit. The total monthly load shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
where:
ML = total monthly load (lb/mo) = average daily load for the calendar month multiplied by the number of days of the calendar month on which a discharge occurred
DL = daily load = daily concentration (expressed as mg/l to the nearest 0.01 mg/l) multiplied by the flow volume of effluent discharged during the 24-hour period (expressed as MGD to at least the nearest 0.01 MGD and in no case less than two significant digits), multiplied by 8.345. Daily loads greater than or equal to 10 pounds may be rounded to the nearest whole number to convert to pounds per day (lbs/day). Daily loads less than or equal to 10 pounds may be rounded to no fewer than two significant figures.
s = number of days in the calendar month in which a sample was collected and analyzed
d = number of discharge days in the calendar month
For total phosphorus, all daily concentration data below the quantification level (QL) for the analytical method used shall be treated as half the QL. All daily concentration data equal to or above the QL for the analytical method used shall be treated as it is reported. If all data are below the QL, then the average shall be reported as half the QL.
For total nitrogen (TN), if none of the daily concentration data for the respective species (i.e., TKN, nitrates/nitrites) are equal to or above the QL for the respective analytical methods used, the daily TN concentration value reported shall equal one half of the largest QL used for the respective species. If one of the data is equal to or above the QL, the daily TN concentration value shall be treated as that data point as reported. If more than one of the data is above the QL, the daily TN concentration value shall equal the sum of the data points as reported.
The quantification levels shall be less than or equal to the following concentrations:
Parameter |
Quantification Level |
TKN |
0.50 mg/l |
Nitrite |
0.10 mg/l |
Nitrate |
0.20 mg/l |
Nitrite + Nitrate |
0.20 mg/l |
Higher QLs may be approved on a case-by-case basis where a higher QL routinely results in reportable results of the species in question or is otherwise technically appropriate based on standard lab practices.
The total year-to-date mass load shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
where:
AL-YTD = calendar year-to-date annual load (lb/yr)
ML = total monthly load (lb/mo)
The total annual mass load shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
where:
AL = calendar year annual load (lb/yr)
ML = total monthly load (lb/mo)
5. The department may authorize a chemical usage evaluation as an alternative means of determining nutrient loading for outfalls where the only source of nutrients is that found in the surface water intake and chemical additives used by the facility. Such an evaluation shall be submitted to the department for review and approval on a case-by-case basis. Implementation of approved chemical usage evaluations shall satisfy the requirements specified under Part I E 1 and 2.
6. Facilities with approved reclamation and reuse programs that choose to base their floating wasteload allocations on treated flow shall measure and report the total annual flow discharged to the reuse distribution system.
F. Annual reporting. On or before February 1, annually, each permittee shall file a discharge monitoring report with the department identifying the annual mass load of total nitrogen and the annual mass load of total phosphorus discharged by the permitted facility during the previous calendar year.
G. Requirement to register; exclusions.
1. The following owners are required to register for coverage under this general permit:
a. Every owner of an existing facility authorized by a VPDES permit to discharge 100,000 gallons or more per day from a sewage treatment work, or an equivalent load from an industrial facility, directly into tidal waters, or 500,000 gallons or more per day from a sewage treatment works, or an equivalent load from an industrial facility, directly into nontidal waters shall submit a registration statement to the department by November 1, 2016, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit in accordance with Part III M. The conditions of this general permit will apply to such owner upon approval of a registration statement.
b. Any owner of a facility authorized by a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit to discharge 40,000 gallons or more per day from a sewage treatment works, or an equivalent load from an industrial facility, directly into tidal or nontidal waters shall submit a registration statement with the department at the time he makes application for an individual permit with the department for a new discharge or expansion that is subject to an offset requirement in Part II of this general permit or to a technology-based requirement in 9VAC25-40-70, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit in accordance with Part III M. The conditions of this general permit will apply to such owner beginning January 1 of the calendar year immediately following approval of a registration statement and issuance or modification of the individual permit.
c. Any owner of a facility treating domestic sewage authorized by a VPDES permit with a discharge greater than 1,000 gallons per day up to and including 39,999 gallons per day that did not commence the discharge of pollutants prior to January 1, 2011, and is subject to offset requirements in accordance with Part II A 1 c of this general permit, shall submit a registration statement with the department at the time he makes application for an individual permit with the department or prior to commencing a discharge, whichever occurs first, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit in accordance with Part III M.
2. All other categories of discharges are excluded from registration under this general permit.
H. Registration statement.
1. The registration statement shall contain the following information:
a. Name, mailing address and telephone number, email address and fax number of the owner (and facility operator, if different from the owner) applying for permit coverage;
b. Name (or other identifier), address, city or county, contact name, phone number, email address and fax number for the facility for which the registration statement is submitted;
c. VPDES permit numbers for all permits assigned to the facility, or pursuant to which the discharge is authorized;
d. If applying for an aggregated wasteload allocation in accordance with Part I B 2 of this permit, a list of all affected facilities and the VPDES permit numbers assigned to these facilities;
e. For new and expanded facilities, a plan to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads, including the amount of wasteload allocation acquired. Wasteload allocations or credits sufficient to offset projected nutrient loads must be provided for period of at least five years; and
f. For existing facilities, the amount of a facility's wasteload allocation transferred to or from another facility to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion.
g. For facilities subject to a floating wasteload allocation as listed in 9VAC25-820-80 with an approved reclamation and reuse system, an indication of whether the allocation should be based on discharged or treated flow. Facilities choosing to base their floating wasteload allocation on treated flow shall provide a water reclamation and reuse flow schematic and a description of how total flows discharged to the reuse distribution system will be measured.
2. The registration statement shall be submitted to the DEQ Central Office, Office of VPDES Permits. Following notification from the department of the start date for the required electronic submission of Notices of Intent to discharge forms (i.e., registration statements), as provide for in 9VAC25-31-1020, such forms submitted after that date shall be electronically submitted to the department in compliance with this section and 9VAC25-31-1020. There shall be at least three months of notice provided between the notification from the department and the date after which such forms must be submitted electronically.
3. An amended registration statement shall be submitted to DEQ immediately upon the acquisition or transfer of a facility's wasteload allocation to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion.
I. Public notice for registration statements proposing modifications or incorporations of new wasteload allocations or delivery factors.
1. All public notices issued pursuant to a proposed modification or incorporation of a (i) new wasteload allocation to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion or (ii) delivery factor shall be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in a local newspaper of general circulation serving the locality where the facility is located informing the public that the owner of the facility intends to apply for coverage under this general permit. At a minimum, the notice shall include:
a. A statement of the owner's intent to register for coverage under this general permit;
b. A brief description of the facility and its location;
c. The amount of wasteload allocation that will be acquired or transferred if applicable;
d. The delivery factor for a new discharge or expansion;
e. If applicable, any proposed nonpoint source to point source trading ratio less than 2:1 proposed under Part II B 1 b (1);
f. A statement that the purpose of the public participation is to acquaint the public with the technical aspects of the facility and how the standards and the requirements of this chapter will be met, to identify issues of concern, to facilitate communication, and to establish a dialogue between the owner and persons who may be affected by the discharge from the facility;
g. An announcement of a 30-day comment period and the name, telephone number, and address of the owner's representative who can be contacted by the interested persons to answer questions;
h. The name, telephone number, and address of the DEQ representative who can be contacted by the interested persons to answer questions, or where comments shall be sent; and
i. The location where copies of the documentation to be submitted to the department in support of this general permit notification and any supporting documents can be viewed and copied.
2. The owner shall place a copy of the documentation and support documents in a location accessible to the public in the vicinity of the proposed facility.
3. The public shall be provided 30 days to comment on the technical and the regulatory aspects of the proposal. The comment period will begin on the date the notice is published in the local newspaper.
J. Compliance with wasteload allocations.
1. Methods of compliance. The owner of the permitted facility shall comply with its wasteload allocation contained in the registration list maintained by the department. The owner of the permitted facility shall be in compliance with its wasteload allocation if:
a. The annual mass load is less than or equal to the applicable wasteload allocation assigned to the facility in this general permit (or permitted design capacity for expanded facilities without allocations);
b. The owner of the permitted facility acquires sufficient point source nitrogen or phosphorus credits in accordance with subdivision 2 of this subsection; provided, however, that the acquisition of nitrogen or phosphorus credits pursuant to this section shall not alter or otherwise affect the individual wasteload allocations for each permitted facility; or
c. In the event he is unable to meet the individual wasteload allocation pursuant to subdivision 1 a or 1 b of this subsection, the owner of the permitted facility acquires sufficient nitrogen or phosphorus credits through payments made into the Nutrient Offset Fund pursuant to subdivision 3 of this subsection; provided, however, that the acquisition of nitrogen or phosphorus credits pursuant to this section shall not alter or otherwise affect the individual wasteload allocations for each permitted facility.
2. Credit acquisition from owners of permitted facilities. A permittee may acquire point source nitrogen credits or point source phosphorus credits from one or more owners of permitted facilities only if:
a. The credits are generated and applied to a compliance obligation in the same calendar year;
b. The credits are generated by one or more permitted facilities in the same tributary, except that owners of permitted facilities in the Eastern Shore Basin may also acquire credits from owners of permitted facilities in the Potomac and Rappahannock tributaries. Owners of Eastern Shore Basin facilities may acquire credits from the owners of Potomac tributary facilities at a trading ratio of 1:1. A trading ratio of 1.3:1 shall apply to the acquisition of credits from the owners of a Rappahannock tributary facility by the owner of an Eastern Shore Basin facility;
c. The exchange or acquisition of credits does not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations as determined by the board;
d. The credits are acquired no later than June 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the credits are applied;
e. The credits are generated by a facility that has been constructed, and has discharged from treatment works whose design flow or equivalent industrial activity is the basis for the facility's wasteload allocations (until a facility is constructed and has commenced operation, such credits are held, and may be sold, by the Nutrient Offset Fund; and
f. No later than June 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the credits are applied, the permittee certifies on a credit exchange notification form supplied by the department that he has acquired sufficient credits to satisfy his compliance obligations. The permittee shall comply with the terms and conditions contained in the credit exchange notification form submitted to the department.
3. Credit acquisitions from the Nutrient Offset Fund. Until such time as the board finds that no allocations are reasonably available in an individual tributary, permittees that cannot meet their total nitrogen or total phosphorus effluent limit may acquire nitrogen or phosphorus credits through payments made into the Nutrient Offset Fund established in § 10.1-2128.2 of the Code of Virginia only if, no later than June 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the credits are to be applied, the permittee certifies on a form supplied by the department that he has diligently sought, but has been unable to acquire, sufficient credits to satisfy his compliance obligations through the acquisition of point source nitrogen or phosphorus credits with other permitted facilities, and that he has acquired sufficient credits to satisfy his compliance obligations through one or more payments made in accordance with the terms of this general permit. Such certification may include, but not be limited to, providing a record of solicitation or demonstration that point source allocations are not available for sale in the tributary in which the permittee's facility is located. Payments to the Nutrient Offset Fund shall be in the amount of $4.60 $5.08 for each pound of nitrogen and $10.10 $11.15 for each pound of phosphorus and shall be subject to the following requirements:
a. The credits are generated and applied to a compliance obligation in the same calendar year.
b. The credits are generated in the same tributary, except that owners of permitted facilities in the Eastern Shore Basin may also acquire credits from the owners of facilities that discharge to the Potomac and Rappahannock tributaries. Owners of Eastern Shore Basin facilities may acquire credits from the owners of facilities that discharge to a Potomac tributary at a trading ratio of 1:1. A trading ratio of 1.3:1 shall apply to the acquisition of credits from owners of facilities that discharge to a Rappahannock tributary by the owners of an Eastern Shore Basin facility.
c. The acquisition of credits does not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations, as determined by the board.
4. This general permit neither requires nor prohibits a municipality or regional sewerage authority's development and implementation of trading programs among industrial users, which are consistent with the pretreatment regulatory requirements at 40 CFR Part 403 and the municipality's or authority's individual VPDES permit.
Part II
SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO NEW AND EXPANDED FACILITIES
A. Offsetting mass loads discharged by new and expanded facilities.
1. An owner of a new or expanded facility shall comply with the applicable requirements of this section as a condition of the facility's coverage under this general permit.
a. An owner of a facility authorized by a VPDES permit first issued before July 1, 2005, that expands the facility to discharge 40,000 gallons or more per day, or an equivalent load, shall demonstrate to the department that he has acquired wasteload allocations sufficient to offset any increase in his delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads resulting from any expansion beyond his permitted capacity as of July 1, 2005.
b. An owner of a facility authorized by a VPDES permit first issued on or after July 1, 2005, to discharge 40,000 gallons or more per day, or an equivalent load, shall demonstrate to the department that he has acquired wasteload allocations sufficient to offset his delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads.
c. An owner of a facility treating domestic sewage authorized by a VPDES permit with a discharge greater than 1,000 gallons per day up to and including 39,999 gallons per day that did not commence the discharge of pollutants prior to January 1, 2011, shall demonstrate to the department that he has acquired wasteload allocations sufficient to offset his delivered total nitrogen and delivered phosphorus loads prior to commencing the discharge, except when the facility is for short-term temporary use only as determined by the department or when treatment of domestic sewage is not the primary purpose of the facility.
2. Offset calculations shall address the proposed discharge that exceeds:
a. The applicable wasteload allocation assigned to discharges from the facility in this general permit, for expanding significant dischargers with a wasteload allocation listed in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation;
b. The permitted design capacity, for all other expanding dischargers; and
c. Zero, for facilities with a new discharge.
3. An owner of multiple facilities that discharge into the same tributary, and assigned an aggregate mass load limit in accordance with Part I B 2 of this general permit, that undertakes construction of new or expanded facilities shall be required to acquire wasteload allocations sufficient to offset any increase in delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads resulting from any expansion beyond the aggregate mass load limit assigned these facilities.
B. Acquisition of wasteload allocations. wasteload allocations required by this section to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads shall be acquired in accordance with this section.
1. Such allocations may be acquired from one or a combination of the following:
a. Acquisition of all or a portion of the wasteload allocations or point source nitrogen or point source phosphorus credits from the owners of one or more permitted facilities, based on delivered pounds by the respective trading parties as listed by the department;
b. Acquisition of credits certified by the board pursuant to § 62.1-44.19:20 of the Code of Virginia. Credits used to offset new or increased nutrient loads under this subdivision shall be:
(1) Subject to a trading ratio of two pounds reduced for every pound to be discharged if certified as a nonpoint source credit by the board pursuant to § 62.1-44.19:20 of the Code of Virginia. On a case-by-case basis the board may approve nonpoint source to source trading ratios of less than 2:1 (but not less than 1:1) when the applicant demonstrates factors that ameliorate the presumed 2:1 uncertainty ratio for credits generation by nonpoint sources such as:
(a) When direct and representative monitoring of the pollutant loadings from a nonpoint source is performed in a manner and at a frequency similar to that performed at VPDES point sources and there is consistency in the effectiveness of the operation of the nonpoint source best management practice (BMP) approaching that of a conventional point source.
(b) When nonpoint source credits are generated from land conservation that ensures permanent protection through a conservation easement or other instrument attached to the deed and when load reductions can be reliably determined;
(2) Calculated using best management practices efficiency rates and attenuation rates, as established by the latest science and relevant technical information, and approved by the board;
(3) Based on appropriate delivery factors, as established by the latest science and relevant technical information, and approved by the board;
(4) Demonstrated to have achieved reductions beyond those already required by or funded under federal or state law, or by Virginia's Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan;
(5) Generated in accordance with conditions of the facility's individual VPDES permit; and
(6) In the case of credits generated by land use conversions and urban source reduction controls (BMPs), the credits shall represent nutrient reductions beyond those in place as of July 1, 2005;
c. Until such time as the board finds that no allocations are reasonably available in an individual tributary, acquisition of allocations through payments made into the Nutrient Offset Fund established in § 10.1-2128.2 of the Code of Virginia; or
d. Acquisition of allocations through such other means as may be approved by the department on a case-by-case basis. This includes allocations granted by the board to an owner of a facility that is authorized by a VPA permit to land apply domestic sewage if:
(1) The VPA permit was issued before July 1, 2005;
(2) The allocation does not exceed the facility's permitted design capacity as of July 1, 2005;
(3) The waste treated by the facility that is covered under the VPA permit will be treated and discharged pursuant to a VPDES permit for a new discharge; and
(4) The owner installs state-of-the-art nutrient removal technology at such a facility.
2. Acquisition of allocations or point source nitrogen or point source phosphorus credits is subject to the following conditions:
a. The allocations or credits shall be generated and applied to an offset obligation in the same calendar year in which the credit is generated;
b. The allocations or credits shall be generated in the same tributary;
c. Such acquisition does not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations, as determined by the board;
d. The allocations are authenticated (i.e., verified to have been generated) by the permittee as required by the facility's individual VPDES permit, utilizing procedures approved by the board, no later than February 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the allocations are applied; and
e. If obtained from the owner of a permitted point source, the allocations shall be generated by a facility that has been constructed, and has discharged from treatment works whose design flow or equivalent industrial activity is the basis for the facility's wasteload allocations.
f. Such allocations or credits shall be secured for a period of five years with each registration under the general permit.
3. Priority of options. The board shall give priority to allocations or credits acquired in accordance with subdivisions 1 a, b, and d of this subsection. The board shall approve allocations acquired in accordance with subdivision 1 c of this subsection only after the owner has demonstrated that he has made a good faith effort to acquire sufficient allocations in accordance with subdivisions 1 a and 1 b of this subsection, and that such allocations are not reasonably available taking into account timing, cost and other relevant factors. Such demonstration may include, but not be limited to, providing a record of solicitation, or other demonstration that point source allocations or nonpoint source allocations are not available for sale in the tributary in which the permittee's facility discharge is located.
4. Annual allocation acquisitions from the Nutrient Offset Fund. The cost for each pound of nitrogen and each pound of phosphorus shall be determined at the time payment is made to the Nutrient Offset Fund, based on the higher of (i) the estimated cost of achieving a reduction of one pound of nitrogen or phosphorus at the facility that is securing the allocation, or comparable facility, for each pound of allocation acquired; or (ii) the average cost, as determined by the department on an annual basis, of reducing two pounds of nitrogen or phosphorus from nonpoint sources in the same tributary for each pound of allocation acquired.
Part III
CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL VPDES PERMITS
A. Monitoring.
1. Samples and measurements taken as required by this permit shall be representative of the monitored activity.
2. Monitoring shall be conducted according to procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or alternative methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, unless other procedures have been specified in this permit.
3. The permittee shall periodically calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instrumentation at intervals that will ensure accuracy of measurements.
4. Samples taken as required by this permit shall be analyzed in accordance with 1VAC30-45 (Certification for Noncommercial Environmental Laboratories) or 1VAC30-46 (Accreditation for Commercial Environmental Laboratories).
B. Records.
1. Records of monitoring information shall include:
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The individuals who performed the sampling or measurements;
c. The dates and times analyses were performed;
d. The individuals who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
2. Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the permittee's sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five years, the permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the registration statement for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report, or request for coverage. This period of retention shall be extended automatically during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the regulated activity or regarding control standards applicable to the permittee or as requested by the board.
C. Reporting monitoring results.
1. The permittee shall submit the results of the monitoring required by this permit not later than the 10th day of the month after monitoring takes place, unless another reporting schedule is specified elsewhere in this permit. Monitoring results shall be submitted to the department's regional office.
2. Monitoring results shall be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) or on forms provided, approved, or specified by the department.
3. If the permittee monitors any pollutant specifically addressed by this permit more frequently than required by this permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or using other test procedures approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or using procedures specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR or reporting form specified by the department.
4. Calculations for all limitations that require averaging of measurements shall utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified in this permit.
D. Duty to provide information. The permittee shall furnish to the department, within a reasonable time, any information that the board may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating coverage under this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The board may require the permittee to furnish, upon request, such plans, specifications, and other pertinent information as may be necessary to determine the effect of the wastes from the discharge on the quality of state waters or such other information as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of the State Water Control Law. The permittee shall also furnish to the department, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit.
E. Compliance schedule reports. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit shall be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date.
F. Unauthorized discharges. Except in compliance with this permit or another permit issued by the board, it shall be unlawful for any person to:
1. Discharge into state waters sewage, industrial wastes, other wastes, or any noxious or deleterious substances; or
2. Otherwise alter the physical, chemical, or biological properties of such state waters and make them detrimental to the public health, to animal or aquatic life, or to the use of such waters for domestic or industrial consumption, for recreation, or for other uses.
G. Reports of unauthorized discharges. Any permittee that discharges or causes or allows a discharge of sewage, industrial waste, other wastes, or any noxious or deleterious substance into or upon state waters in violation of Part III F, or that discharges or causes or allows a discharge that may reasonably be expected to enter state waters in violation of Part III F, shall notify the department of the discharge immediately upon discovery of the discharge, but in no case later than 24 hours after said discovery. A written report of the unauthorized discharge shall be submitted to the department within five days of discovery of the discharge. The written report shall contain:
1. A description of the nature and location of the discharge;
2. The cause of the discharge;
3. The date on which the discharge occurred;
4. The length of time that the discharge continued;
5. The volume of the discharge;
6. If the discharge is continuing, how long it is expected to continue;
7. If the discharge is continuing, what the expected total volume of the discharge will be; and
8. Any steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent a recurrence of the present discharge or any future discharge not authorized by this permit.
Discharges reportable to the department under the immediate reporting requirements of other regulations are exempted from this requirement.
H. Reports of unusual or extraordinary discharges. If any unusual or extraordinary discharge including a bypass or upset should occur from a treatment works and the discharge enters or could be expected to enter state waters, the permittee shall promptly notify, in no case later than 24 hours, the department by telephone after the discovery of the discharge. This notification shall provide all available details of the incident, including any adverse effects on aquatic life and the known number of fish killed. The permittee shall reduce the report to writing and shall submit it to the department within five days of discovery of the discharge in accordance with Part III I 2. Unusual and extraordinary discharges include, but are not limited to, any discharge resulting from:
1. Unusual spillage of materials resulting directly or indirectly from processing operations;
2. Breakdown of processing or accessory equipment;
3. Failure or taking out of service some or all of the treatment works; and
4. Flooding or other acts of nature.
I. Reports of noncompliance. The permittee shall report any noncompliance that may adversely affect state waters or may endanger public health.
1. An oral report shall be provided within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The following shall be included as information that shall be reported within 24 hours under this paragraph:
a. Any unanticipated bypass; and
b. Any upset that causes a discharge to surface waters.
2. A written report shall be submitted within five days and shall contain:
a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause;
b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and
c. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.
The board may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports of noncompliance under Part III I if the oral report has been received within 24 hours and no adverse impact on state waters has been reported.
3. The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part III I 1 or 2, in writing, at the time the next monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part III I 2.
NOTE: The immediate (within 24 hours) reports required in Part III G, H, and I may be made to the department's regional office. Reports may be made by telephone, FAX, or online at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/PollutionResponsePreparedness/ MakingaReport.aspx. https://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/PollutionResponse Preparedness/MakingaReport.aspx. For reports outside normal working hours, a message may be left and this shall fulfill the immediate reporting requirement. For emergencies, the Virginia Department of Emergency Management maintains a 24-hour telephone service at 1-800-468-8892.
4. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in the permit registration statement or submitted incorrect information in a permit registration statement, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
J. Notice of planned changes.
1. The permittee shall give notice to the department as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when:
a. The permittee plans alteration or addition to any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants, the construction of which commenced:
(1) After promulgation of standards of performance under § 306 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1251 et seq.) that are applicable to such source; or
(2) After proposal of standards of performance in accordance with § 306 of the Clean Water Act that are applicable to such source, but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with § 306 within 120 days of their proposal;
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants that are subject neither to effluent limitations nor to notification requirements specified elsewhere in this permit; or
c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee's sludge use or of disposal practices, and such alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or of disposal sites not reported during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.
2. The permittee shall give advance notice to the department of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity that may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.
K. Signatory requirements.
1. Registration statement. All registration statements shall be signed as follows:
a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this section, a responsible corporate officer means (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy-making or decision-making functions for the corporation or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or other actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit registration requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures;
b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or
c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a public agency includes (i) the chief executive officer of the agency or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency.
2. Reports, etc. All reports required by permits and other information requested by the board shall be signed by a person described in Part III K 1 or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:
a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part III K 1;
b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position; and
c. The written authorization is submitted to the department.
3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under Part III K 2 is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of Part III K 2 shall be submitted to the department prior to or together with any reports, or information to be signed by an authorized representative.
4. Certification. Any person signing a document under Part III K 1 or 2 shall make the following certification:
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."
L. Duty to comply. The permittee shall comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the State Water Control Law and the Clean Water Act, except that noncompliance with certain provisions of this permit may constitute a violation of the State Water Control Law but not the Clean Water Act. Permit noncompliance is grounds for enforcement action;, for permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit coverage renewal application.
The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under § 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under § 405(d) of the Clean Water Act within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if this permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement.
M. Duty to reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee shall submit a new registration statement at least 60 days before the expiration date of the existing permit, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the board. The board shall not grant permission for registration statements to be submitted later than the expiration date of the existing permit.
N. Effect of a permit. This permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or invasion of personal rights or any infringement of federal, state, or local law or regulations.
O. State law. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action under, or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to, any other state law or regulation or under authority preserved by § 510 of the Clean Water Act. Except as provided in permit conditions on "bypassing" (Part III U) and "upset" (Part III V), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.
P. Oil and hazardous substance liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under §§ 62.1-44.34:14 through 62.1-44.34:23 of the State Water Control Law.
Q. Proper operation and maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) that are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also include effective plant performance, adequate funding, adequate staffing, and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems that are installed by the permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit.
R. Disposal of solids or sludges. Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or management of pollutants shall be disposed of in a manner so as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering state waters.
S. Duty to mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit that has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.
T. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.
U. Bypass.
1. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur that does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to ensure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Part III U 2 and 3.
2. Notice.
a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, prior notice shall be submitted, if possible, at least 10 days before the date of the bypass.
b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part III I.
3. Prohibition of bypass.
a. Bypass is prohibited, and the board may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass, unless:
(1) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;
(2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass that occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(3) The permittee submitted notices as required under Part III U 2.
b. The board may approve an anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects if the board determines that it will meet the three conditions listed in Part III U 3 a.
V. Upset.
1. An upset, defined in 9VAC25-31-10, constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with technology-based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of Part III V 2 are met. A determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is not a final administrative action subject to judicial review.
2. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:
a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause or causes of the upset;
b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated;
c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part III I; and
d. The permittee complied with remedial measures required under Part III S.
3. In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof.
W. Inspection and entry. The permittee shall allow the director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the administrator), upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to:
1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
3. Inspect at reasonable times facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and
4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act and the State Water Control Law, substances or parameters at any location.
For purposes of this section, the time for inspection shall be deemed reasonable during regular business hours and or whenever the facility is discharging. Nothing contained herein shall make an inspection unreasonable during an emergency.
X. Permit actions. Permits may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, termination, or notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.
Y. Transfer of permits permit coverage. Permits are Permit coverage is not transferable to any person except after notice to the department. Coverage under this permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if:
1. The current permittee notifies the department within 30 days of the transfer of the title to the facility or property, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the board;
2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and
3. The board does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of its intent to deny the new permittee coverage under the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement described in Part III Y 2.
Z. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby.
The James River facilities identified in this section are subject to reduced individual total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations as indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Floating wasteload allocations.
Facility |
VPDES No. |
ACSA - Middle River Regional WWTP |
VA0064793 |
North River WWTF |
VA0060640 |
Waynesboro WWTP |
VA0025151 |
Front Royal WWTP |
VA0062812 |
Broad Run WRF |
VA0091383 |
Leesburg WPCF |
VA0092282 |
VA American Water Prince William - Section 1 WWTF |
VA0024724 |
VA American Water Prince William - Section 8 WWTF |
VA0024678 |
H. L. Mooney WWTF |
VA0025101 |
Opequan WRF |
VA065552 |
Parkins Mill WWTF |
VA0075191 |
Alexandria Renew Enterprises WWTP |
VA0025160 |
Arlington County WPCF |
VA0025143 |
Noman M Cole Jr PCP |
VA0025364 |
Aquia WWTP |
VA0060968 |
Culpeper WWTP |
VA0061590 |
FMC WWTF |
VA0068110 |
Fredericksburg WWTF |
VA0025127 |
Little Falls Run WWTF |
VA0076392 |
Massaponax WWTF |
VA0025658 |
HRSD - York River STP |
VA0081311 |
Totopotomoy WWTP |
VA0089915 |
Lynchburg STP |
VA0024970 |
Moores Creek Advanced WRRF |
VA0025518 |
Falling Creek WWTP |
VA0024996 |
Henrico County WWTP |
VA0063690 |
Hopewell WWTP |
VA0066630 |
HRSD - Boat Harbor STP |
VA0081256 |
HRSD - James River STP |
VA0081272 |
HRSD - Williamsburg STP |
VA0081302 |
Proctor's Creek WWTP |
VA0060194 |
Richmond WWTP |
VA0063177 |
South Central Wastewater Authority WWTP |
VA0025437 |
HRSD - Nansemond STP |
VA0081299 |
HRSD - Army Base STP |
VA0081230 |
HRSD - VIP WWTP |
VA0081281 |
B.Chlorophyll-a based total phosphorus wasteload allocations.
Facility |
VPDES No. |
Richmond WWTP |
VA0063177 |
Falling Creek WWTP |
VA0024996 |
Proctor's Creek WWTP |
VA0060194 |
Henrico County WWTP |
VA0063690 |
Phillip Morris - Park 500 |
VA0026557 |
Hopewell WWTP |
VA0063690 |
South Central Wastewater Authority WWTP |
VA0025437 |