Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Environmental Quality
 
Board
Air Pollution Control Board
 
chapter
Regulation for Emissions Trading [9 VAC 5 ‑ 140]
Action Repeal CO 2 Budget Trading Program as required by Executive Order 9 (Revision A22)
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 3/31/2023
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
3/27/23  10:40 pm
Commenter: Vic N

Using more out of state electricity, more expensive, while paying for a lot more instate generation.
 
In state emissions fell by 6.6 million tons from 2020 to 2022 due to a 12% decline in in-state power production, 
electricity imports skyrocketed from 12% to 30% of the state's power demand, generating 10.3 million tons in emissions,
Stevenson argued, citing data from the U.S. Energy Information Agency. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/state/ https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/ "With power demand on the rise, RGGI will force Virginia to become even more dependent on imports, especially during
those periods of low or no production from solar or wind,"
(https://www.thomasjeffersoninst.org/under-rggi-virginia-releases-more-co2-not-less/) Steve Haner, senior fellow
for the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy. "The whole justification for the new regulatory scheme
Dominion Energy Virginia demanded and got in 2007 was to finance a massive program of building in-state generation
to reduce dependence on imported power." Power companies can purchase carbon dioxide offsets at an auction in order to meet the RGGI's climate targets, which
has thus far generated $590 million for the state of Virginia, Haner reported. In addition to the cost of these
auctions, Stevenson estimates that Virginia power companies lost out on roughly $840 million in revenue due to
decreased in-state power generation.
CommentID: 214224