In addition to being positively discriminating (but discriminating all the same), this guidance is setting applicants up to fail as residents. The way the draft guidance reads, an applicant that obtains a voucher that covers the full amount of rent does not have to provide proof of any additional source of funds; conceivably they could move in with no source of funds or income at all. However, residents must pay for their electricity, their water (in many cases) and renter's insurance - not to mention food and other daily costs of living. It is highly likely, with no additional source of funding, that this resident will default on their utilities and/or their insurance obligation, which will result in their lease being terminated. We are setting this individual up to fail by not requiring that they have any source of funding beyond that which is required to pay their rent.