Agencies | Governor
Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Conservation and Recreation
 
Board
Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board
 
chapter
Stormwater Management Regulations RENUMBERED AS 9 VAC 25-870 [4 VAC 50 ‑ 60]
Action Amend Parts I, II, and III of the Virginia Stormwater Management Program Permit Regulations to address water quality and quantity and local stormwater management program criteria.
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ends 8/21/2009
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
7/13/09  8:11 am
Commenter: Stefan Brooks

Bad for environment and economy - Don't pass
 

At a time in which the economy is struggling we now see proposed changes in stormwater regulations that are detrimental to the environment and economy while originally directed at the development industry to control growth through runoff quality control.

These topics will be affected by the proposed changes since it appears that they will promote SPRAWL since MORE land will be required to develop the same use.  This is in complete contrast to the Green Building Council's LEED development standards which promote high density development and urban redevelopment as well as maintaining or reestablishing natural habitat.

By implementing these changes it will drastically affect the redevelopment initiatives within urban areas where much success is already being seen.  By essentially taking away the opportunity to develop or redevelop land we will see a loss of job opportunities throughout many market sectors.  Additionally, if development does occur, costs incurred will only be passed on to us, the consumers.

On the Public side of development, parks, soccer fields, schools – especially high schools with the numerous sports fields, and community facilities will be directly impacted by these regulations.  These types of facilities are a small sampling of what would be covered under the topic of “managed turf” brought into these regulations and this alone has far-reaching impacts on all development not just private interests.

CommentID: 9268