Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation
 
Board
Board for Professional and Occupational Regulation
 
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
9/25/20  2:32 pm
Commenter: Jack Rosenberger, Virginia Tech

STRONG SUPPORT for continuation of Landscape Architect professional licensure
 

As a licensed Landscape Architect and sole Campus Landscape Architect for Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), I am strongly supporting the continuation of a professional license in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

The American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) believes:

"the practice of landscape architecture, for purposes of the licensing statute, should be defined as any service where landscape architectural education, training, experience and the application of mathematical, physical, social, and natural science principles are applied. Practice includes consultation, evaluation, planning, design (including, but not limited to, the preparation and filing of plans, drawings, specifications and other contract documents) and administration of contracts pertaining to projects principally directed at the safe functional and aesthetic use; conservation and integration of natural and built environments."

All 50 states have recognized that regulation of landscape architecture is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, so for Virginia to deregulate this service would stand out in strong opposition to the rest of our country. The practice of landscape architecture should keep the public safe from hazards, protect and maximize the use of natural systems and resources, and prevent damage to public or private property from changes in the built environment. The education, experience, and examination required to earn a license ensures that licensed landscape architects can effectively protect the public and our communities from harm.

On a professional development note - attaining a professional license in landscape architecture supports the ability to practice independently without supervision or review of another professional. This not only creates more opportunities for management and leadership, but supports several existing Small, Women-owned, and Minority-owned Business (SWaM). These types of businesses, because landscape architecture services can often get lost within large corporate structures (I know from my own lived experience). Not getting licensed limits the career opportunities for your future, and would significantly diminish our professional voice.

Please do not remove regulations for licensure of landscape architecture during this legislature session, and all future sessions as well.

Thank you,

Jack Rosenberger, PLA, ASLA

CommentID: 86295