Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Virginia Department of Health
 
Board
State Board of Health
 
Guidance Document Change: This policy outlines the procedure for means testing of owners who petition the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) for onsite sewage and private well evaluation and design services pursuant to § 32.1-248.4 of the Code of Virginia (the Code). This policy also establishes Hardship Guidelines whereby VDH may serve as a provider of last resort for onsite sewage and private well evaluation and design services pursuant to § 32.1-248.4 of the Code.
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
7/10/19  8:24 pm
Commenter: Fred Beats

Orrock Report RD32 comments in general
 

Correspondence between Virginia Department of Health officials during the RD32(2011)

report to Private Sector Service Delivery for the Onsite Sewage and Well Supply Report.  At

the time of RD32, public records depict agency mentality regarding public health. 

 

The agency does not take sides on legislation, but wrote and lobbied HB888.  This bill is a

testament to the corruption factor associated with public health delivery in Virginia.   

 

Can the agency provide justification for hardship while the state cost of service is 3 times

greater than the cost by private sector on repairs?

 

"From:                                         Knapp, Allen (VDH)

Sent:                                           Friday, September 02, 2011 1:33 PM

To:                                               Bowles, James (VDH); Roadcap, Dwayne (VDH); Bolling, Patrick (VDH)

Subject:                                     Re: Privatization study

 

Guys,

This came up in my conversation with Ben Berteau of Infiltrator. Basically he wondered why we weren't fighting this. I explained that we don't take sides when it comes to legislation...that we provide information, etc. Then it occurred to that if we had concerns about this legislation, we would express them. Then I thought, the only basis we could have for concern would be public health or environment...then I wondered if there might be any data showing any difference betwEen private work and vdh work.

Makes sense on some level- going into the AOSE program we said ther was no data to show that private evaluations are any riskier than public. Now where are we after more than decade?

Allen.

 

From: Bowles, James (VDH)
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 08:52 AM
To: Roadcap, Dwayne (VDH); Knapp, Allen (VDH); Bolling, Patrick (VDH)
Subject: RE: Privatization study
 

I hadn’t thought about trying to compare the failure rate of permits issued by VDH to the failure rate of permits issued by OSEs/PEs.  I think it can be done, at least on a superficial level, but even that would take some time because the teasing the data out would be complicated, given the current structure of the data base. 

 

Once you identify the systems that have failed, it’s not always easy to categorize whether it’s a VDH permit or a private sector permit.  For example, if an EHS issues a construction permit based on an OSE certification letter, is that an EHS permit?  What about if an EHS does a site evaluation and then a PE designs the system?  Failing to stratify the comparison for these differences could produce very misleading results. Then there’s the problem that VDH doesn’t design permits for alternative system.  So, in the end, we might be left with only a relatively small number of systems for comparison:  conventional systems for which the original site evaluation and design were both done either by an OSE or by an EHS.  If we don’t have a large enough population of data, then the results may not be particularly meaningful.

 

And I don’t think that we want to just do a “preliminary analysis” because once it’s done, the data is going to be out there, and it’s going to be difficult or impossible to control the use of bad (or at least incomplete, insufficient) data to support a position that the data, on the surface, seems to support. 

 

The bottom line, IMHO, is that we can do this but it will take some planning and some time.  So we need to decide what we won’t do if  we decide to pursue this.   But it would be interesting, and I’d be willing to pursue it if you have the time to spend helping design the study.

 

Jim

 

 

 

From: Roadcap, Dwayne (VDH)
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 4:18 PM
To: Knapp, Allen (VDH); Bolling, Patrick (VDH)
Cc: Bowles, James (VDH)
Subject: RE: Privatization study

 

I hope to finalize the interview and survey questions next week.  We can follow-up with the manufacturers.  Regarding your second question, I don’t think we have an ability to accurately calculate failure rates of repair permits as far as I know.  VDH issues over 75% of the repair permits.  I’ll let Jim weigh in…..

 

Dwayne

 

From: Knapp, Allen (VDH)
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 8:08 AM
To: Roadcap, Dwayne (VDH); Bolling, Patrick (VDH)
Subject: Privatization study

 

Dwayne and Patrick,

 

I was talking to Ben Berteau from Infiltrator today and two things occurred to me.  First, you may want to consider him as a potential interviewee.  Second, are you planning to look at ‘failure rates’ or repair permits from VDH vs AOSEs?

 

Allen."

 

CommentID: 73444