Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Conservation and Recreation
 
Board
Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board
 
chapter
Stormwater Management Regulations AS 9 VAC 25-870 [4 VAC 50 ‑ 60]
Action Amend the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities found in Part XIV of the Virginia Stormwater Management Permit Program Regulations and its associated definitions found in Part I of those Regulations.
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 12/26/2008
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
12/24/08  2:02 pm
Commenter: Gary Collins, Middle School Teacher, Outdoor Writer

Sediment
 

This is an opportunity to put teeth into the permit and the review process.  I was one of the volunteers with UVA Law School students and the Shenandoah River keeper.  It  became apparent that the process was flawed and many things could have been prevented if there had been clear concise regulations with an adequate review.  In most problem sites, the problem occured and then there was an attempt at remediation.  While other states such as Maryland are doing many things to be proactive in water quality improvement, Virginia has taken a back seat.  There is a glimmer of hope that Virginia may be changing in the recent action of the SWCB delay of Merck's discharge permit into the South Fork of the Shenandoah.  Both North River and Middle River, which are tributaries of the South Fork of the Shenandoah, alreadt suffer from heavy sediment deposits.  I strongly urge a more stringent regulatory approach and with a sincere effort to review and then enforce.

CommentID: 6611