In discussing the current VRA with our staff, we do not really see the need to re-design the form, especially if you are changing the size of the application.  Changing the size creates big problems with our filing system.  However, if the form is to be changed, we feel the only issues that need to be addressed are moving the applicant’s previous address higher on the form so he does not miss completing that section; and changing the informational wording that addresses the identification requirements and the receipt of acknowledgement of registration.       In reviewing the proposed new VRA and accompanying Regulations, I offer the following comments.   Application       Do not use color on the form; it is more costly to produce.  There appears to be less writing on the new application, yet the font is smaller (harder to read) than before.    The wording for 17-year-olds registering to vote should be changed to “17-year-olds who will be 18 by the next November general election may register and vote in any intervening election(s).”  Referencing the Presidential Primary limits the timeliness and usefulness of the form.      In No. 2, Mailing Address, I think it would be more clear to say “Mailing address, if different from residence address.”  The box concerning “authorized or required” is confusing, both on page 1 and in the explanation on the reverse.     In No. 4, I would add “an” before active duty.   Under Protected Voter Requirements, indent the second line for TSC.    Date of birth is not listed on the form.    Why is there a check box for Military?  Why are the military voters being singled out?  They should remain grouped with the overseas voters; they are all UOCAVA voters.       Regulations    Checking the boxes for citizenship, felony conviction and mental capacity are very important, and they should be considered MATERIAL OMISSIONS.  For instance, if the voter does not affirm that he is a citizen, that sets in motion more procedures that are mandated by the Code for non-citizen applicants.  For the ½ second it would take the voter, it would save hours of work for election staff.  The signature at the bottom of the application does not necessarily affirm what we need to know.  We are all guilty of signing forms and not reading what we are signing; the signature in practicality is not a solid affirmation. 

In addition, Article II, Section 2, of the Virginia Constitution requires that applications to register voters provide the full name; date of birth; residence address; Social Security Number, if any; whether the applicant is a US citizen; and such additional information as may be required by law.

§24.2-418 of the Code of Virginia, Application for Registration, also lists gender, address of residence in the precinct, place of last residence of registration and whether the applicant has been adjudicated incapacitated or convicted of a felony as requirements for the application.

These mandated requirements should all remain on the Voter Registration Application and not merely wrapped up in the signature at the bottom.