DEQ should not change their current definition of nontidal wetlands. I do not see the need to change the definition since DEQ's existing definition is scientifically sound as is. Not only is the definition sound, nontidal wetlands play an important role for water quality, community flood resilience, and provide countless benefits to fish and wildlife habitats. Waterfowl and other types of birds use nontidal wetlands for breeding, wintering, and migrating. Nontidal wetlands also provide much needed organic material and food for the Chesapeake Bay food chain. 

This year, the General Assembly decided to not role back protections for tidal wetlands and nontidal wetlands in a bipartisan manner. Moreover, The Commonwealth broadly defines the term "state waters" to include for environmental protection purposes to cover wetlands, including non-tidal wetlands.

I do not think that an individual should have the power to change the definition of nontidal wetlands when the General Assembly decided to do the exact opposite in a bipartisan manner. This role back will hurt more than it will help nontidal wetlands and in turn does nothing for VA to meet the goals for the Chesapeake Bay and stop upstream pollution. This role back will have a negative impact on all wildlife who use nontidal wetlands, and it will have a negative impact on the outdoor recreation sector which generates billions of dollars in VA and the highest amount comes from boating and fishing.

I implore you to reject this change.