I strongly oppose this proposed amendment.  As a counselor educator, supervisor, and LPC,  I believe it would be a very poor decision to include LCSWs as supervisors.  Developmentally,  counselors-in-training are still solidifying their professional identity and need the mentorship of LPC.  While I support residents being collaborative with colleagues across disciplines in their work (and there will be plenty of opportunity), an LPC can help help the resident navigate the differences that abound.  As a counselor educator I have seen the challenges and confusion students can experience in their practicum and internship  when working under an LCSW site supervisor, even in understanding of clinical skills.  In this context, the counselor-in-training also has the faculty supervisor (LPC) for support and direction.  This is just as important in residency.   Overall, here is importance in maintaining consistency in the training established through the MA programs and CACREP; social work is distinctly different and does not represent the same framework and focus.  

The counseling profession is unique, including its philosophy and teachings. For the same reason, neither the Board of Psychology nor the Board of Social Work permits LPCs to supervise future psychologists or social workers. Likewise, we believe that future LPCs should be supervised by experienced members of their own profession.

Sincerely, 

Rhonda Ladd, PhD, LPC