Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Environmental Quality
 
Board
Air Pollution Control Board
 
chapter
Regulation for Emissions Trading [9 VAC 5 ‑ 140]
Action Repeal CO 2 Budget Trading Program as required by Executive Order 9 (Revision A22)
Stage NOIRA
Comment Period Ended on 10/26/2022
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
10/4/22  10:15 pm
Commenter: Rick Galliher, Faith Alliance for Climate Solutions

Keep RGGI, we need flood abatement projects in SW Virginia.
 

RGGI funds flood abatement projects which are desperately needed in Southwest Virginia. The Governor wants to pull out of RGGI because it will increase our energy costs. Dominion overcharged its customers over 1 BILLION dollars over the past 6 years - that's what really increased our costs. There is not one piece of evidence that removing Virginia from RGGI will decrease our energy costs, just a fools hope that Dominion will pass along savings. You can bet that won't ever happen.

Southwest communities have been severely affected by flooding in the past year. FEMA funds don't help families, but RGGI funds do. They can also fund abatement projects to avoid future flooding, giving needed infrastructure jobs to the region, saving families and communities from calamities that are becoming ever more common. This funding cannot be replaced by Virginia tax money. If the Southwest doesn't get RGGI money, they get nothing, just thoughts and prayers. Let's help the families and towns in the southwest, stay with RGGI. 

CommentID: 185327