Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation
 
Board
Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior Designers, and Landscape Architects
 
chapter
Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior Designers, and Landscape Architects Regulations [18 VAC 10 ‑ 20]
Action Develop regulations for a mandatory continuing education requirement for architect, professional engineer, and land surveyor licenses.
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 5/2/2008
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
3/6/08  10:37 am
Commenter: Matthew L. Rush, P.E.

The State is Challenging Each Professional's Integrity
 

 

The concept of professionals continuing their education to stay current and proficient in their field is valid, but this does not require government regulation. Anybody who actually uses their license must already keep up with the changing codes/regulations in their field or they are violating the code of ethics by stamping/signing a drawing or document they are not familiar with.

I went to school for 4 years to get a degree in Mechanical Engineering. I then prepared for and passed a vigorous exam to be licensed and considered a professional in my field. Along with that license comes the understanding that I am a competent individual that would only stamp/sign a drawing or document that I am fully knowledgably of. The State is insulting us as professional individuals by stating that we are not capable of remaining educated enough to make good decisions, when that is exactly what the P.E. license grants us the trust to do.

As professionals, we are held accountable for our work, we do not need a government agency to maintain our knowledge and proficiency in the field. It is already stated in 18 VAC 10-20-730; "the professional shall undertake to perform professional assignments only when qualified by education or experience, or both, and licensed or certified in the profession involved." Is this statement not enough?

Also, there is no evidence that supports continuing education from the standpoint of health and safety of the state.

CommentID: 736