Rationale for Service Model Transition
Where is the publicly available data to explicity outline the rationale for transitioning service facilitation into a support broker model.
Appendix H - Quality Improvement
The performance methodologies for monitoring quality improvement are outlined, but there is no documentation referenced of what, if any, key performance indicators have not been met by the current structure and/or how those will be addressed through future measurements and/or structures.
Part I - 2024 Comments
Part I found on page 10 of 341 within 1915C, as drafted, references comments made during the 2024 public comment period expressing feedback on the service facilitator service. DMAS' written response to this feedback was that they were "disheartened" by the feedback which spoke to backlogs, interruption of services, etc..., however, there is no publicly or easily accessible data to reflect what actionable efforts DMAS made to identify and/or address the contributing factors to that experience, rather their response merely included that there is mandated service provider training required every 5 years by order of the General Assembly.
Consumer Directed Care Network Contract
Phase 4 Ongoing Monitoring
Language in this section indicates that based on legislative changes the state will contract with its Fiscal Employer to transition from service facilitation to support brokers...
Phased Implementation Outline
There is an indication that there will be a phased approach to implementation, however, that phased plan has not been shared to date.