I object to this requirement because:

1.  Some queens seem to be rejected by the colony once marked.  Although this is not a universal response to marking, however, I have personally witnessed bees "balling" a newly marked queen that minutes before had been accepeted and laying in the hive.

2.  Some marking comes off of the thorax of the queen, so it is hard to be sure queens were marked.  It would be a shame for liability to be voided just because paint was removed from a healthy queen.

3.  I believe that clipping the wings of a queen is harmful to the queen, may lead to less acceptance of the queen by the colony, interupt natual swarming which is really heathy for the colony

4,  I don't see any connection between marking a queen and any potential "harmful" activity from the hive.  How would a marked queen prevent some innocent person from being stung.  There needs to be a strong connection between the two for this to be included in the BMP.