Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Counseling
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Professional Counseling [18 VAC 115 ‑ 20]
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
8/29/18  6:13 pm
Commenter: El Schoepf

OPPOSED to objective to restrict counseling licensure to CACREP-only programs
 

As a student in the University of Baltimore’s Applied Psychology Counseling Psychology MS training program, I oppose the Virginia Counseling Board’s stated (in meeting minutes and to prospective licensees) objective to restrict licensure to CACREP-program graduates. The University of Baltimore prepares qualified counselors who have a strong counselor identity, a good understanding of the ethics underlying the counseling profession, as well as a background in psychological science. Upon graduation, I wish to retain my eligibility to practice in the state of Virginia, and CACREP restrictions would eliminate my ability to ever move to, work in, and serve the residents of Virginia as a counselor, given that my graduate program is not CACREP accredited (nor is it eligible, based on the faculty’s degrees in clinical and counseling psychology). It can already be exceedingly difficult to find an appropriate therapist, and restricting licensure to graduates of CACREP-only programs will only make access to mental health and related counseling services more difficult for Virginia residents.

In addition, I oppose the current regulation restricting supervision of counseling residents to LPCs and LMFTs. This regulation potentially endangers national licensure portability plans, further divides the sister professions of counseling and psychology, and limits options for clinical supervision during counselor residency at a time when consumers need more access to services, not less.

Maryland continues to include psychologists, social workers, and psychiatrists as supervisors for Licensed Graduate Professional Counselors (LGPCs; the analogous level of practice to Virginia’s “counseling resident”) and does not discriminate against licensure applicants from Virginia’s programs based on program accreditation, as there are no program accreditation requirements in Maryland for counselor licensure. As a neighboring state, I hope that Virginia will remain open to us as potential licensees, as Maryland remains open to Virginia graduates who meet educational requirements, regardless of program accreditation.

CommentID: 66787