Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Criminal Justice Services
 
Board
Department of Criminal Justice Services
 
chapter
Regulations Relating to Private Security Services [6 VAC 20 ‑ 171]
Action Comprehensive Review Private Security Services Regulations
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 10/24/2012
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
10/23/12  3:41 pm
Commenter: Cynthia Washburn

Regulation changes.
 

Allow me to preface this with my opinion that electronic security: alarms and locksmiths, should be in a separate group within (or without) DCJS, since our functions vary greatly from others under DCJS.    We obtained our ES licensing in 2005, before locksmith licensing was required because we were seeing that we were getting into a grey area with some of the electronic locking systems that we were installing.  Therefore; I feel that licensing for locksmith or for alarm folks should include the overlapping aspect of the work that both groups do.  As locksmiths and a locksmith business, we find it crucial to stay abreast of new procucts and new technology if we want to able to provide our customers with the calibre of service that they deserve and are paying for. This should be, if adequately documented, sufficient for license renewal.

We need to simplify requirements: backround check, fingerprinting and a completed  locksmith course and/or an apprenticeship and pass an exam, either by the locksmithing school or one that would be available through DCJS.  This exam should be created by a small group of competent, knowledgeble locksmiths currently licensed in Virginia and be available on line.  Continuing education should be required by employers and records of such submitted to DCJS by the licensee or compliance agent prior to renewal. 

I do not want anyone who knows little or nothing about locksmithing or electronic access to have a locksmith license.  Conversely, I want EVERYONE who does any work pertaining to locksmithing to have a valid license; no exemptions.

I also agree whole heartedly with Wayne Boggs about the complicance agent issue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CommentID: 24354