The proposed changes in the regulations for gifted programs are flawed in several substantive ways. Most importantly, the undermine the current regulations which were developed with careful attention to the theory and research on the components of programs that provide quality education to this population of students.

First, te proposed changes negate the need for specialized training (endorsement, M.Ed.) in gifted education in order to teach or coordinate gifted programs. The research-based guidelines for gifted program produced by the National Association for Gifted Students clearly emphasize the importance of teacher training in providing appropriate education for gifted students. To not include such requirements in the regulations would be a major step backward for gifted education in Virginia.

The proposed changes that negate the need for 5-year plans approved by the state board of education including the coordinator of gifted at the state level will also diminish quality. If we expect our programs to of high quality we need a review from those who have expertise in the field of gifted education. While school baord approval is necessary, it is not sufficient.

Third, if we eliminate earmarking funds for use for gifted programs will and eliminate the requirement they be spent on gifted education programming, we can be assured those funds will no longer support those services and gifted students in rural and urban areas will no longer receive quality (if any services).

The support of gifted education in Virginia is minimal. To change these regulations ignoring the priniciples of quality programming is reprehensible and irresponsible.