I am writing to oppose changes to regulations for gifted education in Virginia, specifically sections 8VAC20-40-60 and 8VAC20-40-70 of the proposed revisions. 

Meeting the needs of gifted students requires a long-range plan to provide continuity for students as they transition from one grade to the next.  A five-year plan offers consistency in the process and content for gifted instruction.  In contrast, annual plans have a short-term focus and could result in drastic changes from one year to the next.  Additionally, oversight of the planning and approval process by DOE will continue to ensure plans are of high quality and similar between districts, versus having various plans created and approved by individuals with less expertise in gifted education.

Repealing language that dedicates funding for gifted education will result in fewer resources being committed for this purpose.  Without this requirement, it is highly likely school divisions will redirect the funding for other needs they view as more critical.

If adopted, these changes will result in a decrease in effectiveness, or worse, the elimination of gifted services for students who are entitled to being challenged to their full potential. Therefore, I urge you to retain provisions for long-term planning, DOE approval and dedicated funding for gifted education.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Margaret E. White