I strongly oppose because the proposal implies that CACREP programs produce better prepared counselors (which has not been empirically verified) and applies undue credentialing hardship on professionals that have degrees from other credentialing organizations.  As a graduate from a CACREP program in Virginia, I am disappointed that my home state is interested in exclusionary practices.  I have lived and worked in several states simply because they did not penalize me for a  CACREP approved degree.  In addition, Virginia has many transient residents from the military and other walks of life.  I hope that Virginia counselors want to provide a reasonable pathway to licensure for well trained counselors from other states which would demonstrate a respect for colleagues outside of the state of Virginia and an attitude of inclusion not exclusion.