Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Physical Therapy
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Physical Therapy [18 VAC 112 ‑ 20]
Action Practice of dry needling
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 2/24/2017
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
12/27/16  9:17 pm
Commenter: Laurie Daigle, PT, MA; Germanna Community College

Support PT Dry Needling Legislation
 

Sirs/Mesdames:

I write as both a Physical Therapist and as a patient, in support of the TDN (Trigger Point Dry Needling) legislation that is pending.  As a PT and Assistant Professor in a Physical Therapist Assistant program, I can attest to the stringent educational standards that are basic to PT education.  The continuing education required for potential practitioners of dry needling is extensive and exhaustive, in order to, first and foremost, protect the patient from harm.  As a patient who has experienced TDN as administered by a qualified PT, I can also report that its effects are remarkable, and serve to decrease muscle tension, making ongoing related PT treatment more effective.  Regarding the comparison to acupuncture, I have experienced both (though for different conditions), and the sensations felt very different.

I wholeheartedly support the passage of this legislation, so that qualified and well-trained Physical Therapists can continue to provide this valuable treatment.

Thank you.

Laurie Z. Daigle, PT, MA

CommentID: 55709